  blah blah blah
@insightBB.com
| reply to IGGY Re: Insight AUP Violation
Go Iggy!
I posted before about running a game server "within reason" like once or twice a week. Personally I think that should be allowed. As far as P2P file sharing apps, I can understand why they would want to block those, since they are usually sharing illegal stuff. You are right though about it being a reason for broadband's popularity.
btw, I get hits on FTP and some ports that I think are for P2P apps almost every night, and I have never run any of those kind of programs here, so Insight might be scanning for open ports like 2kmaro said. |
|
  hockeyfun1$ Down With Dc Exec Premium join:2000-11-26 New Hartford, NY | What kind of server is it that you are running? |
|
  blah blah blah
@insightBB.com | I am not running a server, I'm afriad of them booting me off for something stupid like a once-a-week game server with some friends. |
|
  hockeyfun1$ Down With Dc Exec Premium join:2000-11-26 New Hartford, NY | A Game Server is still a server. 
Why would they send you the letter then? Does the game use a lot of bandwidth? What port does the gaming server run on? |
|
  IGGY No Guru Just Here To Help Premium,MVM join:2001-03-30 Chatham, IL
| reply to blah blah blah I have no doubt. They are doing auto scans. But the question is? Where does this all end. I can name several legit uses for all the things they like to block. And again. They state you can use your broadband for this & that. They hype how broadband is more than email & web surfing. Then punish you. When you use your connection. For what they advertised you could use it for. If your not running a 24/7 server. Or downloading or uploading gigs of data a month. Then I can't see why they would snap. And if someone is using to much bandwidth. Give them a choice. Either pay more. Or no service. Seems very simple to me. There competition is definitely a lot more liberal on game servers etc. If Insight & others. Continue they way they have. They will in fact loose business. And several post in this forum. Show they have lost customers. And don't seem to eager to keep them. It's sad how little power the consumer has in all this. -- *IGGYZ* *TeamZ* |
|
  hockeyfun1$ Down With Dc Exec Premium join:2000-11-26 New Hartford, NY | But not everyone runs servers. It's only a small percentage that wont have much of an impact if they lose them or not. |
|
  IGGY No Guru Just Here To Help Premium,MVM join:2001-03-30 Chatham, IL
| I don't agree. If you count all the P2P users. You start booting them. You will see a big dent in the end year results. And if they continue to not listen. To customers who have requested. For a long time. That there be a choice of bandwidth packages. They will continue to loose customers. As several post here have shown. There hasn't been a mass revolt true. Mostly do to the fact. That competition is limited. As well as choice. But if DSL & others. Started to truly compete. With speed, price, availability & no contract. You would in fact start to see a lot users. Who would in fact drop cable. Especially if the DSL providers remained liberal. And again. Where does this stop? MIRC,IQC,PALTALK & others could all be considered servers. Even though they have other uses. So where does it stop? -- *IGGYZ* *TeamZ* |
|
  blah blah blah
@insightBB.com
| reply to hockeyfun1$ hey sorry to confuse everyone but I am not the Busted that started this topic, I had a separate post a week or so ago about servers to get opinion on it
anyway, I flat out asked the tech support in an email about my little situation of wanting to host a server once or twice a week for some games
They said to just make sure the ports are firewalled when not in use so they don't get picked up as an active server.
So that should answer the questions if there were any. Insight does do port scanning on higher bandwidth usage clients. |
|
  hockeyfun1$ Down With Dc Exec Premium join:2000-11-26 New Hartford, NY | So if you are running a firewall wouldn't you see a few thousand alerts (or the max it shows) from the same address probably? |
|