 | reply to nerdburg
Re: [Speed] Apartment Complex Slow at Nights? Motorola 6120
ShaperProbe: (DAY TEST) Connected to server 80.239.168.233.
Estimating capacity: Upstream: 5367 Kbps. Downstream: 20776 Kbps.
The measurement will last for about 2.5 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: Burst size: 4787-4905 KB; Shaping rate: 2128 Kbps.
Downstream: Burst size: 9365-9797 KB; Shaping rate: 8512 Kbps.
For more information, visit: »www.cc.gatech.edu/~partha/diffprobe logout
Signal Levels:
Downstream Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 1 2 Frequency 585000000 Hz 579000000 Hz Signal to Noise Ratio 37 dB 37 dB Downstream Modulation QAM256 QAM256 Power Level The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading 0 dBmV 0 dBmV
Upstream Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 3 Frequency 21600000 Hz Ranging Service ID 6571 Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/sec Power Level 43 dBmV Upstream Modulation [3] QPSK [2] 16QAM
Ranging Status Success
Signal Stats (Codewords) Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 1 2 Total Unerrored Codewords 17710387396 530517456 Total Correctable Codewords 15 0 Total Uncorrectable Codewords 763 1408
Speed Tier: 8/2
Error Logs:
Only one that shows up is this twice a week or so.
No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=e4:83:99:8b:ed:de;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:3c:f2:43;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
|
 DarkLogixTexan and ProudPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | btw it looks like it is a D3 area ie you have 2 downstream channels |
|
|
|
 EGThe wings of lovePremium join:2006-11-18 Union, NJ kudos:9 | Perhaps one or two more channels need to be added. |
|
 bdnhsv join:2012-01-20 Huntsville, AL | reply to itisme17604 I'd be interested to see some traceroutes to some sites (both during the day when speeds are good and to the same sites at night when your speeds are slow). Maybe 2-3 sites and see if there is a noticeable difference from day to night. |
|
 | reply to DarkLogix I had thought that D3 areas have upgraded from 8/2 to 12/2 or 16/2 am I correct? That is what happened with my parents place in the Bay Area where they have 4-8 channel downstream. |
|
 DarkLogixTexan and ProudPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | said by itisme17604:I had thought that D3 areas have upgraded from 8/2 to 12/2 or 16/2 am I correct? That is what happened with my parents place in the Bay Area where they have 4-8 channel downstream. Its common but not required
If you have channel bonding you have D3 if you weren't upgraded to 16 or 12 then that just means that marketing is slow there
you could call them and ask about it |
|
 | reply to itisme17604 NIGHT TEST 10:50pm
ShaperProbe Connected to server 217.163.1.100.
Estimating capacity: Upstream: 5830 Kbps. Downstream: 4363 Kbps.
The measurement will last for about 2.5 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: Burst size: 4450-4587 KB; Shaping rate: 2090 Kbps.
Downstream: Measurement aborted due to high packet loss rate.
Another test resulted:
Connected to server 38.102.0.111.
Estimating capacity: Upstream: 6951 Kbps. Downstream: 5007 Kbps.
The measurement will last for about 2.5 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: Burst size: 4795-4974 KB; Shaping rate: 2128 Kbps.
Downstream: Burst size: 1401-1484 KB; Shaping rate: 2725 Kbps.
Signal Levels Downstream Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 1 2 Frequency 585000000 Hz 579000000 Hz Signal to Noise Ratio 38 dB 37 dB Downstream Modulation QAM256 QAM256 Power Level The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading 0 dBmV 0 dBmV
Upstream Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 3 Frequency 21600000 Hz Ranging Service ID 6571 Symbol Rate 2.560 Msym/sec Power Level 43 dBmV Upstream Modulation [3] QPSK [2] 16QAM
Ranging Status Success
Signal Stats (Codewords) Bonding Channel Value Channel ID 1 2 Total Unerrored Codewords 23884706961 6704836888 Total Correctable Codewords 45 84 Total Uncorrectable Codewords 763 1486
Notes For the speed tier 8/2, this is kind of unacceptable when the internet slows down this much at night. I can easily get a 20mpbs Powerboost during the day, but at night, on Speedtest.net, I can only get 3-4 mpbs if I'm lucky. One of the ShaperProbe tests said that the packetloss was too high? What does this mean? |
|
 nerdburgPremium join:2009-08-20 Schuylkill Haven, PA kudos:1 | Your signal levels are good and consistent. That does indeed look like a capacity issue to me. The only other possibility to my mind would be some upstream noise problems, but then I wouldn't expect to see such a dramatic and consistent drop in download speeds. |
|
 DarkLogixTexan and ProudPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | said by nerdburg:Your signal levels are good and consistent. That does indeed look like a capacity issue to me. The only other possibility to my mind would be some upstream noise problems, but then I wouldn't expect to see such a dramatic and consistent drop in download speeds. Unless theres some rouge TV or such thats being turned on at those times and killing it |
|
 | reply to nerdburg Is there anyway Comcast can fix this capacity issue? Anything I can do on my end? |
|
 | There's nothing you can do besides get a tech out to verify if it's a noise problem or not. If it's capacity related there are multiple things they can do to address the issue depending on the current setup. Capacity can be relieved by adding more QAMs (which is unlikely), a node or transmitter split which is more likely the solution. |
|
 EGThe wings of lovePremium join:2006-11-18 Union, NJ kudos:9 | said by Floppy: Capacity can be relieved by adding more QAMs (which is unlikely), a node or transmitter split which is more likely the solution. Why is adding more carriers "unlikely" ? Which would be cheaper for them to do ? |
|
 beachintechThere's sand in my tool bagPremium join:2008-01-06 kudos:5 Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by EG:said by Floppy: Capacity can be relieved by adding more QAMs (which is unlikely), a node or transmitter split which is more likely the solution. Why is adding more carriers "unlikely" ? Which would be cheaper for them to do ? Depends completely on the plant setup and condition. -- Ex-Tech at the Beach. I speak for myself, not my former employer. |
|
 EGThe wings of lovePremium join:2006-11-18 Union, NJ kudos:9 | I wasn't asking you...  |
|