| I'm confused - what am I supposed to be mad at here It seems that Shaw is doing the right thing here? The evil thing would be to give their service an exception to the caps, while subjecting their competitors to one.
So all is good? |
|
|
|
| I agree. |
|
| Me as well. And what does this mean:
"superficial in nature, with heavy usage penalties remaining"
New tiers seem transparent enough, and what penalties? There are no overage charges anymore. Extremely biased reporting. |
|
| reply to nfotiu
said by nfotiu:So all is good?
When you use low Caps, net neutral means nothing really. |
|
