 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | reply to RJ44
Re: What threat? Of course they are not going to physically pull the fiber. It's a term used to stop deployment or bring it to a crawl. |
|
 RJ44 join:2001-10-19 Nashville, TN | said by ptrowski:Of course they are not going to physically pull the fiber. It's a term used to stop deployment or bring it to a crawl. Huh? The Verizon spokesman said (quoting the article) "Santoro said Verizon is still committed to building its FIOS fiber-optic broadband service in Massachusetts".
How is that a threat to FIOS deployment? |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| said by RJ44:said by ptrowski:Of course they are not going to physically pull the fiber. It's a term used to stop deployment or bring it to a crawl. Huh? The Verizon spokesman said (quoting the article) "Santoro said Verizon is still committed to building its FIOS fiber-optic broadband service in Massachusetts". How is that a threat to FIOS deployment? The threat would be the speed that it takes. Technically they could light up one community in the year and still say they are building it out. They can slow the pace considerably. -- "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
|
|
 RJ44 join:2001-10-19 Nashville, TN | There WAS no threat to FIOS deployment in that statement.
I see the headline has now been changed to reflect that. Less sensationalistic, but much more accurate. |
|