  Edit This Premium,MVM join:2001-05-08 | Nikon D700 is Da Bomb.
Click Here to Read the article |
|
  Mellow Premium join:2001-11-16 Salisbury, MD | Its a nice body, I hope it drives the prices down on the D300. |
|
  overhill Judd Premium,MVM join:2001-02-03 Miami, FL | reply to Edit This Looks great! |
|
  KyleC Nikon Guy Premium join:2001-12-13 Irving, TX | reply to Edit This i will have two in hand on Tuesday. If yall have any questions let me know.
I am certainly not a camera tester, but I will do my best to post examples or answer any questions. |
|
  No_Strings Premium,MVM join:2001-11-22 The OC
| reply to Edit This said by Luminous Landscape :
[Regarding image quality] ... among the lowest noise and otherwise highest image quality of any camera. Hard to not like that.
said by Luminous Landscape :
Truly amazing is that ISO 25,000 equivalent, though noisy, is no worse than Tri-X used to be at ISO 1,200. Wow! I need one.
said by Luminous Landscape :
I would suggest that a two camera kit consisting of a D300 and a D700 is almost ideal. Yeah, and if I had a four-bay garage, parking a Lamborghini and a Ferrari in the other two stalls would be ideal. Sadly, ...

Time to start dipping into the kids' college fund. |
|
  Rubicon Premium join:2001-02-20 Philly
| reply to KyleC I'm curious how well it works with DX lenses and the quality of the 5mp NEF. (I'm assuming that it can record NEF in crop mode)
said by KyleC :i will have two in hand on Tuesday. If yall have any questions let me know. I am certainly not a camera tester, but I will do my best to post examples or answer any questions. -- R u b i c o n |
|
  TigerNutz Laissez les bons temps rouler Premium join:2000-12-23 Lafayette, LA | reply to Edit This Here is the beast unboxed:
»www.engadget.com/2008/07/27/niko···n-video/ -- ................... |
|
  KyleC Nikon Guy Premium join:2001-12-13 Irving, TX
·AT&T Southwest
edit: July 27th, @03:38AM
| reply to Rubicon said by Rubicon :I'm curious how well it works with DX lenses and the quality of the 5mp NEF. (I'm assuming that it can record NEF in crop mode) ok, i will upload a crop mode nef for you.
ew, I dont like the fx on the strap. ill put a d1h strap on there instead, they were softer back then anyways. I also hate the d3 strap as the leather side is now rough fake leather. But i have spent 0 time looking for good replacements, so I cant complain right now. |
|
  sykocus Watashi Wa Shashin O Toru Ga Suki Desu Premium join:2002-11-21 Guam, USA
edit: July 27th, @02:08PM
| reply to No_Strings said by Luminous Landscape :
I would suggest that a two camera kit consisting of a D300 and a D700 is almost ideal. That seems a little redundant doesn't it? What does the D300 that the D700 doesn't, and the D700 is barely a quarter pound heavier. I think a D3/D700 combo would be killer.
said by No_Strings  Time to start dipping into the kids' college fund. Eye nevar phinishined kollage and loock at mi know. -- My Gallery Image quality is not the product of a machine but of the person who directs the machine, and there are no limits to imagination and expression. -Ansel Adams |
|
  sykocus Watashi Wa Shashin O Toru Ga Suki Desu Premium join:2002-11-21 Guam, USA
edit: July 27th, @02:14PM
| reply to TigerNutz Interesting that it has a LCD cover. Does that mean that it doesn't have tempered glass over the screen like the D3? |
|
 hse High Speed Edition Premium join:2003-10-25 ON, Canada | IQ should be identical to the D3, so there's really little need to wait for test results. |
|
  ccallana Huh? Premium,VIP join:2000-08-03 Folsom, CA
·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to sykocus said by sykocus :said by Luminous Landscape :
I would suggest that a two camera kit consisting of a D300 and a D700 is almost ideal. That seems a little redundant doesn't it? What does the D300 that the D700 doesn't, and the D700 is barely a quarter pound heavier. I think a D3/D700 combo would be killer. I think his point was using the D300 for long lens shooting since the crop factor gets you out further... D700 will get you wider. put them together and shazam  -- "We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us.... We are far too easily pleased." C.S. Lewis |
|
  Rubicon Premium join:2001-02-20 Philly
| reply to sykocus D3 + D700 = $8,000 D700 + D300 = $4,800
I think the D700+D300 combo would be a good compromise in cost and performance. Event photogs, esp. weddings benefit from having 2 bodies. 1. no fumbling with lenses. 2. You have a backup body.
A 70-200mm on the D700 and the 17-55mm DX on the D300 could be a good combo.
or.. 70-200mm on the D700 and the 24-70mm on the 2nd D700.
Sounds like quite a workout!
said by sykocus :said by Luminous Landscape :
I would suggest that a two camera kit consisting of a D300 and a D700 is almost ideal. That seems a little redundant doesn't it? What does the D300 that the D700 doesn't, and the D700 is barely a quarter pound heavier. I think a D3/D700 combo would be killer. said by No_Strings  Time to start dipping into the kids' college fund. Eye nevar phinishined kollage and loock at mi know. -- R u b i c o n |
|
  KyleC Nikon Guy Premium join:2001-12-13 Irving, TX
·AT&T Southwest
edit: August 11th, @07:24PM
| reply to Edit This
 side by side d700-d3 |  NIKON D3 42mm 1/30th F7.1 ISO2000
d700 wedding image (ignore the d3 marker, the exif was hacked to import into Aperture) |  NIKON D3 48mm 1/250th F16 ISO200
D2x and D2h For Sale!!!!!!! (PM ME) |
I have had the D700 for over a week now, and I have used it during 2 weddings for over 1500 frames. Overall its a great camera, but I am not sure if its right for me. I am hard on my gear and have the highest standards, even the little things annoy me.
Positives: • D3 quality in a small body, files look identical. • solid build quality vs 5d and d200/300. (other than CF door and pop up flash, I hate them both) • shutter is quieter than d3. • Battery life really surprised me, better than d200.
Negatives: • the auto focus is not as confident in very dark situations. • focus points are very bright, and non-adjustable, it causes glare on the mirror when they are activated. • body size doesn't feel as good in my hand, its just not balanced with anything less than a wide or mid zoom. Feels awkward to me with anything 70-200mm or larger. I HAVE to use two hands with anything but a light weight wide zoom or fixed. (I know you are saying "who cares, use two hands dummy" but I do some one handed shooting while hand holding an off camera flash.) • pop up flash is loose on the top, I taped it down, pops up when the button is slightly bumped which happens allot when a camera is hanging on your shoulder. • I really miss the exposure indicator in the viewfinder and the back info display (I am trying to train myself to use the info button on the back to see iso and other settings at a glance, but that is slow going). • RAWs are not compatible with anything but NX2 for right now. This is really the most annoying thing, but its partially my fault for early adopting, partially Nikon's for being greedy and not sharing pre-release info to other vendors.
Most of these negatives can be put in perspective by looking at the price difference between these two bodies. Its still an amazing camera, but the best can be had for $1700 more.
I sold my second one to my friend who came from a d300 and he loves it. His favorite thing, other than the low noise, is the fact that its full frame.
I don't think I will be keeping this one much past when/if Nikon releases a d3x. I may get more used to the size and change my mind, but after using full size bodies for 9 years, I am more accustomed to the feel and balance they provide.
Files: Crop mode DX D3 vs D700 (you will need nx2 to open the d700 files or change the exif to d3): »tinyurl.com/5uctj7 d700 wedding raws (exif says d3 so you can import to anything that can read a D3 raw): »tinyurl.com/5omjww -- |::| My DSLR Gallery |::| PhotoBlog |::| Website |::|
|
|
 hse High Speed Edition Premium join:2003-10-25 ON, Canada
·Cogeco Cable
| quote: I really miss the exposure indicator in the viewfinder and the back info display (I am trying to train myself to use the info button on the back to see iso and other settings at a glance, but that is slow going).
Wait, it doesn't show the over/under exposure meter in the viewfinder? Where is it located then? |
|
  KyleC Nikon Guy Premium join:2001-12-13 Irving, TX
·AT&T Southwest
| said by hse : quote: I really miss the exposure indicator in the viewfinder and the back info display (I am trying to train myself to use the info button on the back to see iso and other settings at a glance, but that is slow going).
Wait, it doesn't show the over/under exposure meter in the viewfinder? Where is it located then? Sorry I wasn't specific, on the d3 the over/under exposure meter is giant and on the right side of the mirror. now its small and at the bottom next to the aperture and f-stop info. |
|
 hse High Speed Edition Premium join:2003-10-25 ON, Canada | Ah, okay. That is similar to Canon where the prosumer models have it on the bottom as well. |
|
  Jodokast96 R.I.P Bassman442 Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ | reply to KyleC Wouldn't adding the grip put in line sizw-wise with the D3? |
|
  KyleC Nikon Guy Premium join:2001-12-13 Irving, TX
·AT&T Southwest
| said by Jodokast96 :Wouldn't adding the grip put in line sizw-wise with the D3? Yes, but that makes it heavier than a d3. EEEK. |
|
  Rubicon Premium join:2001-02-20 Philly | reply to KyleC Kyle - thanks for sharing your experience with it. I dont' think that you'll have any problems selling off your D700.. Perhaps a D700s in the future? I'll check out the crops soon -- R u b i c o n |
|