Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon Confusing FiOS Customers Under Contract » And this is news?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Wish FiOS wasn't a Verizon product  
AuthorAll Replies

Gog123

join:2008-03-25


1 edit
reply to MrSpock29
Re: And this is news?

I said Time Warner Cable has infrastructure on par with Verizon FIOS as far as the end user is concerned once Docsis 3.0 is implemented. Both systems are fiber optics based with different headend, billing and provisioning.

Yes I was saying that if Verizon FIOS was more money for the same speed, people would be choosing FIOS cause of Verizon's marketting department.

Verizon locks into year or multiyear contracts and keeps pushing contracts which have expensive penalty fees for non compliance. Time Warner has no contracts and will also improve upon speed.

These comments yet again confirm I will be staying with Time Warner Cable for service.

I am planning on getting the new Lenovo T61 replacement with the Montevina chipset so I will have my WiMax wired solution connected to my Time Warner Cable for wired.

Time Warner Cable is going the right way here.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

said by Gog123 See Profile :

I said Time Warner Cable has infrastructure on par with Verizon FIOS as far as the end user is concerned once Docsis 3.0 is implemented. Both systems are fiber optics based with different headend, billing and provisioning.

Yes I was saying that if Verizon FIOS was more money for the same speed, people would be choosing FIOS cause of Verizon's marketting department.

Verizon locks into year or multiyear contracts and keeps pushing contracts which have expensive penalty fees for non compliance. Time Warner has no contracts and will also improve upon speed.

These comments yet again confirm I will be staying with Time Warner Cable for service.

I am planning on getting the new Lenovo T61 replacement with the Montevina chipset so I will have my WiMax wired solution connected to my Time Warner Cable for wired.

Time Warner Cable is going the right way here.
If you believe that cable connections which are shared and terminate at a node instead of a home is better, that is your opinion that you are entitled to, however, it is not fact.
Everyone locks into multi-year contracts. I left Comcast, and they are STILL trying to get me locked in for 2 years. That is nothing at all unique to verizon, and yes, others do charge termination fees.
You have given TWC credit for so many things they haven't even done yet, while telling everyone all the things Verizon wouldn't do.
After being asked several times, you have avoided the issue of caps in the future with TWC.
It's fine to be happy with what you have, but there is no need for you to troll everyone else.

EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Let's be fair- passive optical networks as currently deployed are also a shared medium, though with far more bandwidth than coaxial cable networks.

It is theoretically possible to use wavelength division multiplexing to provide each house on a PON Fiber-optic network with a dedicated connection, but the technology isn't cheap or feasible for home deployment yet.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ


1 edit
said by EPS See Profile :

Let's be fair- passive optical networks as currently deployed are also a shared medium, though with far more bandwidth than coaxial cable networks.

It is theoretically possible to use wavelength division multiplexing to provide each house on a PON Fiber-optic network with a dedicated connection, but the technology isn't cheap or feasible for home deployment yet.
This is a continuation from trolling from another thread, no one said that GPON wasn't shared either. However, 32 vs. well over 100, maybe a lot more, plus all the other advantages, is the point.

I'll also add it is a little humorous to see those who want to contact every lawyer in the country, even though no one has said their rates were changed unfairly.
Forums » Verizon Confusing FiOS Customers Under Contract« Wish FiOS wasn't a Verizon product  


Saturday, 28-Nov 14:28:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [75] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [61] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Why would I want an e reader? [General Questions]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Back to Comcast - Life Sucks Again - Montgomery County, MD [Comcast Cable TV]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· TPIA review by Electronic Box [Canadian Broadband]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· adding wireless router and wireless printer [Comcast HSI]