Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Developing New Web Browser » this is innovation?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Next thing you know »
« How long til?  
AuthorAll Replies


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

reply to benyto
Re: this is innovation?

i disagree.

imagine the chaos of firefox being installed by default on all new dsl or cable installs. no doubt it will also cause problem with the integration of ie with xp and vista...

not to mention the ill feelings people have toward AT&T. they could at least not be so obnoxious and arrogant about their ambitions. do one of those stupid toolbar search things first. see how it works. THEN attempt a new browser.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
I guess Fedora Core would be out of the question for AT&T as well.
--
Canada = Hollywood North


benyto
Premium
join:2000-07-09
Chico, CA

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

i disagree.

imagine the chaos of firefox being installed by default on all new dsl or cable installs.
An ISP providing/installing a branded browser is not a new thing. Why should this be any different.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
there's a difference between installing a new browser over "branding" IE, as is usually the case.


benyto
Premium
join:2000-07-09
Chico, CA

I'm curious what you think the problems will be, and why those problems would stop AT&T from installing their browser as a default. You make some claim about integration problems with XP and Vista. Surely many people use Firefox, Opera, or other non-Microsoft browsers on those platforms. What show-stopping integration problems do you foresee that would stop AT&T from doing such a thing?

For what it's worth I don't use Windows. I don't know of the existence or absence of such problems. I'm not trying to bait you in to anything here. I'm honestly curious if you know of something that would make this a headache that isn't worthwhile for AT&T to try. It is not something I would put past them.
Forums » AT&T Developing New Web BrowserNext thing you know »
« How long til?  


Sunday, 23-Nov 04:12:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [199] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [109] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [87] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [84] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [80] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [72] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [69] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [60] Just 26% of U.S. Broadband Users Faster Than 5Mbps
· [59] Friday Open Thread
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
Most people now reading
· Is there any point now in switching? [TekSavvy]
· [ Professions] WotLK engineering [World of Warcraft]
· Getting hot/neutral reverse; no breaker flip or reset fix [Home Repair & Improvement]
· What Deathknight Race to roll with? [World of Warcraft]
· [Femtocell] The Beginning of the End of Residential VOIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· APRS question [Ham Radio]
· [WotLK] PVP gear at 80 [World of Warcraft]
· [Home Network] Set up remote access to my home computer [AT&T Southeast]