Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Radio Silence » Only have seen two stations...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
What's the big deal, really? »
« This Just In  
AuthorAll Replies

disc

join:2005-12-31
Raleigh, NC

reply to Time4aNAP
Re: Irony

said by Time4aNAP See Profile :

As a licensed terrestrial radio broadcaster, WFMU is exempt from the back-breaking royalty rates. It's nice to have their support, but ironic since they have nothing to lose.
Good point. I followed one of their links and they had this to say:

WFMU believes in compensating artists. We currently pay webcasting royalties to SoundExchange and will continue to do so, but we are protesting the new rate scheme for a number of reasons:

1. Under the new rates, non-commercial webcasters only get a break on the commercial royalty rate if they maintain small listenership numbers. In order to afford the astronomical new rates, WFMU may have to cap online listenership on our streams, limiting our accessibility to music fans.

2. SoundExchange has not been dutifully distributing webcasting royalties to artists, claiming on their website that they are unable to locate thousands of artists including Kraftwerk, The Replacements, Pizzicato Five, The Muffs, and even Warren G!


The second point is noble, but the first one certainly hits their bottom line. I would think it would hit all college stations that webcast too.

Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL

said by disc See Profile :

The second point is noble, but the first one certainly hits their bottom line. I would think it would hit all college stations that webcast too.
Not really. The station's rate card is based on OTA listeners, not the Internet listenership. Some advertisers might pay a token fee for the extra exposure from webcasts, but nothing compared to what they pay for the Nielsen and/or Arbitron rated coverage.

Up until now, streaming has been an inexpensive way to promote your station. If and when it stops being inexpensive, terrestrial broadcasters will simply stop streaming. That means that you'll no longer be able to listen to your favorite hometown radio station when you're on vacation, but it's no real loss for the station itself.
Forums » Radio SilenceWhat's the big deal, really? »
« This Just In  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 13:18:24 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [95] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [73] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [16] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [13] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [11] FCC Broadband Problem List Omits 'No Competition,' FCC Itself
· [10] Time Warner Dallas Customers Get WiMax December 1
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· hawaii in thanksgiving [General Questions]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· Attn TSI: Copyright vs Customers - Some Questions [TekSavvy]
· Killing the source - Google bans advertisers, not just ads [Security]
· News Corp, MS Teaming Up In Plan To Pay for Obscurity ? [Security]
· CTV & Canwest ask CRTC to order blocking of U.S. programs [TekSavvy]