republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Dodge the RIAA: Turn Off Wi-Fi Security » Bad Article, Poor Advice
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


PolarBear
The bear formerly known as aaron8301

join:2005-01-03
Riverside, WA
·CableOne

reply to iSEPIC
Re: Bad Article, Poor Advice

iSEPIC, I agree wholly.

An excerpt from another post of mine in a different forum:


The plaintiff in a civil suit should be required to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt in front of a jury of at least 6 peers, similar to a criminal case. The idea of "whoever's case sounds slightly better wins," sucks ass, especially since, unlike a criminal charge, you can sue someone for ANYTHING!

Also, the plaintiff (and his lawyer) should be required to show the court what the plaintiff has spent on his legal "offense," and pay the same amount to the defendant for his defense before the proceeding may commence. Or something similar to that. My point to this is, a large corporation with a multi-million dollar team of attorneys should not be able to sue Jane Doe and her kids who can barely afford her Kia Payment and the Mac and Cheese on the dinner table. If Major Corp. sues Jane Doe, Jane has the right to be equally defended at no cost to her, since she didn't start the lawsuit in the first place (just like in the criminal court system; they'll give you a lawyer if you can't afford to hire one).
--
"I invented it, Bill made it famous." --David Bradley, the inventor of Ctrl+Alt+Del.

bigjimc

join:2003-04-21
Middleboro, MA
·Verizon FIOS

If the **AA wanted to prove a point why don't they file criminal actions against the alleged persons?

They would then have to prove it (not just attempt to extort $3k and drop the case).
--
Just my 2 cents...Flame Lightly...


PolarBear
The bear formerly known as aaron8301

join:2005-01-03
Riverside, WA
PERFECT, bigjim!


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
Albany, NY

reply to bigjimc
Nah, it proves their point by all of those dirty rotten pirates who settle. Ignore the fact that the lawsuit and potential expenses stemming from it likely scares many innocent people into settling rather than fighting. That's not important. What's important is that their settlement papers say that they are dirty rotten pirates!

(Above said with heavy sarcasm just in case someone doesn't get it. )


PolarBear
The bear formerly known as aaron8301

join:2005-01-03
Riverside, WA
Oh, I got it (bastards)!
Forums » Dodge the RIAA: Turn Off Wi-Fi Security


Monday, 01-Dec 23:48:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [90] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [63] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [57] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [17] FCC To Vote On Free National Wireless Broadband
· [12] Clearwire May Slow WiMax Build
· [6] Embarq Rejected Higher Offer
· [5] Hawaii Telecom Files For Bankruptcy
· [4] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· Upverting DVD players vs Blue ray DVD players. [General Questions]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· Java SE Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 Update 11 [Security]
· Maintaince Tonight or tomorrow? [TekSavvy]
· [WotLK] New Hunter Macros [World of Warcraft]
· Hacking router [Security]