bamabrad
join:2006-01-27
Port Orange, FL | 30 MONTHS!? It should be" untill ATT redeems itself! ( A LOOOOOONG Time) | |
|
 bamabrad
join:2006-01-27
Port Orange, FL | Re: 30 MONTHS!? Or how about " month to month" ? | |
|
 | |
tkdslr
join:2004-04-24
Pompano Beach, FL
 ·Speakeasy
| said by bamabrad  :It should be" untill ATT redeems itself! ( A LOOOOOONG Time) Or until the monopoly is broken up again.
The neutrality conditions should also set the price to resellers, below the lowest dsl combo minus voice sevice costs&profits they're imposing on retail customers.
And it should require that the service be offered in a pure bridged atm format. (And not the PPPoX over Bridged, which often impacts connectivity and reliability.)
===
The Baby bells are leveraging DSL service in order to maintain voice circuit monopoly. (Cable co's are doing the same.. Standalone Inet access significantly more expensive than with TV service bundles.) It's time for this little scam to end. | |
|
ispjournalist
@internet.com | A good question: who would buy naked DSL if they knew they'd get cut off after 30 months? Who'd invest in a business plan that depended on offering under a third party brand name like EarthLink? | |
|
|
|
|
for fcc to review att's actions