Re: Found this interesting...

Author	All Replies
MrChupacabra Premium join:2003-03-26 Florida ·Bright House	reply to Joe12345678 Re: Found this interesting... Why charge per system? You're still limited to the total up and down speeds no matter how many systems you run. We'll still only support one PC to the modem though. -- If it's worth saying, it is worth saying politely
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-10-03 14:11:15 ·
Joe12345678 join:2003-07-22 Des Plaines, IL	said by MrChupacabra : Why charge per system? You're still limited to the total up and down speeds no matter how many systems you run. We'll still only support one PC to the modem though. if they get rid of nat then you may have to pay per ip and 1 system = 1 ip
Joe12345678 join:2003-07-22 Des Plaines, IL	to forum · permalink · · 2006-10-03 16:28:18 ·
elios join:2005-11-15 Springfield, MO	not if you use a router or hell a linux box with 2 nics in it thall never know
elios join:2005-11-15 Springfield, MO	to forum · permalink · · 2006-10-03 16:56:54 ·
MrChupacabra Premium join:2003-03-26 Florida ·Bright House	reply to Joe12345678 From what I've understood from IPv6 is there is still a segment of the IP range for private (internal) use. So where is NAT going exactly? -- If it's worth saying, it is worth saying politely
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-10-04 13:54:34 ·


Monday, 09-Nov 07:28:11	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF