sman83
join:2004-11-09
Urbana, IL | Sounds interesting
I am downloading and going to try this I want the anonymity it "says" it can provide. |
|
scareg
join:2003-10-27
Walla Walla, WA
| Sounds interesting but does seem to have one serious flaw. Below is a speed test while using it.
dslreports.com speed test result on 2006-09-20 14:05:14 EST:
49 / 99
Your download speed : 49 kbps or 6.2 KB/sec.
Your upload speed is much faster than down.. have you tweaked?
Your upload speed : 99 kbps or 12.3 KB/sec. |
|
technick
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Loganville, GA | reply to sman83
Ive been using torpark a few days now, its not bad at all. One of the coolest parts is its completely portable and works great on a usb thumb drive. |
|
proxymaybe
@comcast.net | reply to scareg
I haven't looked at the specs for the browser, but my guess is that it's probably using an anonymous web proxy server which will result in really slow speeds. |
|
Derwood
join:2003-01-21
Dayton, OH
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to sman83
I've had torpark for months now.. It is nice, but slow.
However, you'll never get to my website on torpark. I've scripted a blacklist of tor IP addresses, and update the list hourly..
While tor can be used for good, it is also used for bad. Many spammers and spam harvesters go through tor now. Many IRC networks also block tor for the same reasons. |
|
