Re: Caps... Impossible upstream..

Author	All Replies
MxxCon join:1999-11-19 Brooklyn, NY clubs:	reply to Vamp Re: Caps... Impossible upstream.. said by Vamp : It should be noted that these upstream (and downstream) speeds can't be heavily used while i agree with you regarding upstream, downstream is unrestricted. there are no reports of users getting any caps or warning for downloading too much. -- [Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]
MxxCon join:1999-11-19 Brooklyn, NY clubs:	to forum · permalink · · 2006-09-15 10:05:19 ·
sh0ckie join:2002-07-10 Bronx, NY	While it's great to see CV respond to competition from VZ by raising its speed, it's useless if their backend can't handle the load. I'm not the only OOL user who has seen the quality of the service degrade in the past few months. Speeds are far more erratic than they used to be, even during off-peak hours.
sh0ckie join:2002-07-10 Bronx, NY	to forum · permalink · · 2006-09-15 12:43:35 ·
cypherstream Looking forward to the future of things. Premium,MVM join:2004-12-02 Reading, PA clubs:	Hopefully they have a really clean ingress free return path capable of reliably using 64QAM modulation in the upstream on 6 MHz channels. If that's the case, I have to say KUDOS to Cablevision for maintaining such a clean plant. If not, we'll expect to see those people with borderline levels get knocked off as they can't reliably transmit upstream.
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-09-15 13:04:53 ·


Monday, 09-Nov 00:07:29	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF