cypherstream
Looking forward to the future of things.
Premium,MVM
join:2004-12-02
Reading, PA
clubs:
| reply to sh0ckie
Re: Caps... Impossible upstream..
Hopefully they have a really clean ingress free return path capable of reliably using 64QAM modulation in the upstream on 6 MHz channels. If that's the case, I have to say KUDOS to Cablevision for maintaining such a clean plant. If not, we'll expect to see those people with borderline levels get knocked off as they can't reliably transmit upstream. |
|
sh0ckie
join:2002-07-10
Bronx, NY
| reply to MxxCon
While it's great to see CV respond to competition from VZ by raising its speed, it's useless if their backend can't handle the load. I'm not the only OOL user who has seen the quality of the service degrade in the past few months. Speeds are far more erratic than they used to be, even during off-peak hours. |
|
MxxCon
join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY
clubs: 
| reply to Vamp
said by Vamp  :It should be noted that these upstream (and downstream) speeds can't be heavily used while i agree with you regarding upstream, downstream is unrestricted.
there are no reports of users getting any caps or warning for downloading too much.
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB] |
|
subman87
Another day in the Brentwood
join:2000-11-24
Harrison, NY | reply to Vamp
50/10 would be nice.......... |
|
Vamp
5c077
Premium
join:2003-01-28
MD
 ·Verizon FIOS
1 edit | It should be noted that these upstream (and downstream) speeds can't be heavily used, they are just not supported by the network. It would only take about 5-6 people to max out the entire node.
If it works, it works on a system that has a cap threshold (cap on heavy use) or that has very few heavy users (doubtful).
PS. I hope FIOS responds with 50/10  |
|
