jeffjs
join:2000-12-11
US
 ·Comcast
1 edit | reply to DMS1
Re: running cat5 isn't that hard is it?
said by kd6cae  : in general, running any internal wiring is an expensive exercise, especially when trying to achieve a good cosmetic effect. Also, the average service call to install CAT5 in a home is over 4 hours! No one wants a sweaty service guy in your home for over 4 hours.
--
I walk upon this Earth by the power of my own two legs. |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here | reply to kd6cae
They'rerunning nothing. The MOCA and HPNA is only for utilizing existing runs. New runs would be CAT5e. |
|
DMS1
join:2005-04-06
Carrollton, TX
| reply to kd6cae
said by kd6cae :OK why are they so interested in running coax all of a sudden if they're already running cat5 now? They aren't. What they are interested in is using the existing coax that is already there. You say that running Cat 5 isn't hard, but, in general, running any internal wiring is an expensive exercise, especially when trying to achieve a good cosmetic effect. |
|
kd6cae
P2p Shouldn't Be A Crime
join:2001-08-27
Lancaster, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| OK why are they so interested in running coax all of a sudden if they're already running cat5 now?
Why didn't they start with coax to begin with? So if I understand it right, the path would go fiber to coax to small run of cat5 at your computer? I guess that'd work. |
|
