Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » New Verizon DSL Fees » Typical
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
136
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
DIsband the FCC! »
« call it what it is: price INCREASE  
AuthorAll Replies

axess_denied

join:2004-07-23
Long Beach, CA

Typical

"The surcharge helps offset costs we incur from our network supplier"

I'd love to be in a business where I could charge for a product, and then add additional fees to charge again for the same product.

This doesn't even have the appearance of being anything BUT a BS fee meant to boost profitability.

Ah well, like all the other bogus fees and surcharges, I suppose we just get to swallow them like usual.

Sure love my Voice Pulse VOIP - the price I get billed is the monthly service charge - no other crap (although perhaps that will be changing thanks to the ruling cited).

lesopp

join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL
Here's a thought. Since the entity originally known as UUNet is now Verizon Business, aren't they their own network supplier.

They should call it a "circle jerk" fee.


nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

said by lesopp See Profile :

Here's a thought. Since the entity originally known as UUNet is now Verizon Business, aren't they their own network supplier.
They've always been their own network supplier.

-tom

cptmiles
Premium
join:2004-04-22
Swayzee, IN
reply to lesopp
That's exactly right. Their network provider is the deregulated arm of themselves. It's like paying yourself to clean your own house and writing it off your taxes as a business expense.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

reply to axess_denied
said by axess_denied See Profile :

"The surcharge helps offset costs we incur from our network supplier"

I'd love to be in a business where I could charge for a product, and then add additional fees to charge again for the same product.
Don't take this as defending Verizon because I'm not, but thanks to deregulation, Verizon the telco, Verizon the backhaul provider, and Verizon the ISP are all 3 separate entities within the Verizon umbrella. They essentially have to treat each other as separate companies, "charging" one another for services provided just like they would charge Covad or other CLECs or other ISPs.

That being said, I see this fee more like just another way to raise rates (even though the net gain is close to 0) without raising the advertised rates. Now as long as they stay away from my FiOS data connection...
--
Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?
Forums » New Verizon DSL FeesDIsband the FCC! »
« call it what it is: price INCREASE  


Sunday, 08-Nov 13:49:24 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· Odd Memory Issue [Computer Hardware Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]