SammyBK
I'D Rather Be Skiing
join:2000-09-07
Los Angeles, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| We thought of this
We were going to do this at our house, but just got lazy. For anyone who did not have a registered MAC address, all webpages would redirect to an authentication page which would be some variant of goatse, tubgirl or lemonparty. It would however have a box to request registration on the network.
Someday. |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
 ·Speakeasy
| said by SammyBK  :We were going to do this at our house, but just got lazy. For anyone who did not have a registered MAC address, all webpages would redirect to an authentication page which would be some variant of goatse, tubgirl or lemonparty. It would however have a box to request registration on the network. Someday. Exactly. It's a lot of fun to do these kinds of things it's just the "finding the time" problem that always gets in the way. Personally, I'd love to set up a WiFi AP with extra range just so I could tempt people. 
-tom
--
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis |
|
AnonProxy
Proxy of Anon
Premium
join:2001-05-12
ß | reply to SammyBK
Dumb idea, you route people to pr0n and it's a kid....you have some serious trouble. |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| said by AnonProxy :Dumb idea, you route people to pr0n and it's a kid....you have some serious trouble. Those sites aren't porn. They're just disturbingly disgusting.
-tom |
|
ReVeLaTeD
Premium
join:2001-11-10
San Diego, CA
| reply to SammyBK
Which is why I prefer MAC Auth instead of standard security. MAC and port redirection lets me get the utmost level of control. The only problem is those people who know how to get your actual MAC address and clone it by connecting to your Wi-Fi adapter as either a false infrastructure or via ad-hoc (If the user didn't block it). |
|
jsouth
Jsouth
join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS | reply to AnonProxy
No. You don't have any trouble. The kid shouldn't be on your service anyway.
--
BTK is guilty!!!! |
|
phattieg
join:2001-04-29
Winter Park, FL | reply to SammyBK
You know, someone around my house tried to do that, they even turned off DHCP and DNS, but I just made my own IP, and used Verizon's DNS servers because they were easy to remember. |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| reply to nixen
said by nixen :said by AnonProxy :Dumb idea, you route people to pr0n and it's a kid....you have some serious trouble. Those sites aren't porn. They're just disturbingly disgusting. -tom Yes they are. Lemonparty has 3 old men involved in oral sex. That's not porn? Goatse is a dude stretching his anus to an unimaginable width. One could do a colon examination just from that pic. Tubgirl is some Japanese chick lying in a bathtub with her butt in the air and squirting enema waste out of her butt and having it land directly on her face. |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| said by BF69 :said by nixen :said by AnonProxy :Dumb idea, you route people to pr0n and it's a kid....you have some serious trouble. Those sites aren't porn. They're just disturbingly disgusting. -tom Yes they are. Lemonparty has 3 old men involved in oral sex. That's not porn? Goatse is a dude stretching his anus to an unimaginable width. One could do a colon examination just from that pic. Tubgirl is some Japanese chick lying in a bathtub with her butt in the air and squirting enema waste out of her butt and having it land directly on her face. Ok, I'll ammend: Goatse and Tubgirl are not porn - they are just disturbingly disgusting.
Happy, now?
-tom
--
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis |
|
Fatal Vector
join:2005-11-26 | reply to jsouth
Now, you know that wont matter, especially depending on the age of the kid. They'll smack you hard anyway because you are, supposedly, an adult and are expected to know better. |
|
jsouth
Jsouth
join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS | Yes. It will matter. You didn't invite or tell the kid to access your network and what you do is your own business. It's not any different than a kid accessing porn from Google.
--
BTK is guilty!!!! |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
| reply to SammyBK
hard thing is they would have to prove that it was your router causing the redirect. that means getting a warrent and seizing your router, by which time you could have reset it to factory settings and basicly eliminated any case they would have.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
99664227
Heavily MODerated
Premium
join:2002-11-21
USA
| reply to SammyBK
said by SammyBK :We were going to do this at our house, but just got lazy. For anyone who did not have a registered MAC address, all webpages would redirect to an authentication page which would be some variant of goatse, tubgirl or lemonparty. It would however have a box to request registration on the network. Someday. Don't forget www.meatspin.com 
--
DSL Reports most moderated member. |
|
insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
1 edit | reply to AnonProxy
Technically no. Police are going so far as to arrest someone for using an unprotected wifi connection. If police are going to pretend it's illegal to access a completely open connection, then the child would have to be arrested.
All this of course despite the fact that windows will automatically connect you to an open wifi connection. Which means if you leave it open, you absolutely know people will end up using it. |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to phattieg
said by phattieg :You know, someone around my house tried to do that, they even turned off DHCP and DNS, but I just made my own IP, and used Verizon's DNS servers because they were easy to remember. Which is why you set up your DHCP server to set up aliased IPs for the address range it manages, then unalias them as it allocates them. That way, even if someone does decide to be smart and snare an IP, they've got competing devices on the network with the same address. Makes usage practically impossible. 
-tom
--
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
| reply to phattieg
said by phattieg :You know, someone around my house tried to do that, they even turned off DHCP and DNS, but I just made my own IP, and used Verizon's DNS servers because they were easy to remember. i wonder is it illegal to access people's machines that appear on your network? ie if a freeloader gets past even your security can you say start deleting their files.(i found that sometimes Linux samba ignores windows and will bypass access restrictions of network drives from win).
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
AnonProxy
Proxy of Anon
Premium
join:2001-05-12
ß
| reply to nixen
Ummm yeah they are....showing genitalia is generally considered a form of porn. Granted it depends on context.
If a teacher can't hold up the picture in class and show it without getting fired or getting in a lot of trouble, you would to.
Simple version, anything that would be considered R rated in a movie for sexual content is going to get you some jail time if you show it to a minor. |
|
