mbnt
join:2002-06-22
Clifton, NJ
1 edit | reply to kamm
Re: who cares?
Whatever. Posting replied on here is like talkin' to brick walls. Everyone's out to just flame each other.
--
“Unless you've seen KISS live, you don't understand the band.” —Paul Stanley, KISS. (2003). |
|
cbrigante2
Cubs 20??
Premium
join:2002-11-22
North Aurora, IL
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc  :Not catering to 5% of the market? Big loss there...  I thought I read that Apple now held closer to 10% of the market now somewhere? |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to mbnt
Not catering to 5% of the market? Big loss there...
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to xmrocks
said by xmrocks :Maybe if you actually read my post, you would have read that I said I don't know of any other sites. Thanks for the flame! I'm sorry, it wasn't about flaming. 
I just simply hate all of those false Apple-related urban legends and wnated to set the record straight. |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
4 edits | reply to mbnt
said by mbnt :What an ignorant answer, those sites don't even cater to Mac users with their Windows Media DRM garbage. Umm look who's talking... the original statement was only about being first.
(BTW it'd be more than funny if somebody would proudly claim Apple did something first on OS X only.  )
Besides that a single-digit market force like OS X doesn't really convince anybody to develop something specific for them - because the fact of the matter is Apple decided not to develop anything that would play WMV, only MS had put out some shitty-buggy beta for a while...
Talk about showing sheer ignorance...
PS: WMV and WMVHD or VC-1 is far superior to anything Apple was able to come up - same or better quality with lower hw requirements, you know... |
|
mbnt
join:2002-06-22
Clifton, NJ
| reply to kamm
What an ignorant answer, those sites don't even cater to Mac users with their Windows Media DRM garbage.
--
“Unless you've seen KISS live, you don't understand the band.” —Paul Stanley, KISS. (2003). |
|
xmrocks
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-23
clubs:  
 ·Comcast
|  reply to kamm
Maybe if you actually read my post, you would have read that I said I don't know of any other sites.
Thanks for the flame!
--
I don't tolerate phishing - >>phishtracker |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
1 edit | reply to xmrocks
said by xmrocks :said by TKJunkMail :A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Agreed about the price. However, I still think it'll be a big success down the road. At first, I'm thinking iTunes/Apple will get slammed with criticism about it but still be a pioneer in that respect of bring movies to your desktop for a price (at least I know of know Mac-compatible sites for movie rentals/downloads at the current time though I'm sure there are Windows-based sites). And people will rent the movies -- that's the thing. I agree they'd be dummies for doing it, but I have a hunch it'll be successful. Call me crazy  Ummm please, stop right here. Don't start another fake 'being-first' urban legend about Apple (like CD-ROM, DVD, gigabit, Firewire etc), please.
There are numerous online movie stores out there:
»www.movielink.com
»www.vongo.com
»www.cinemanow.com
»www.atomfilms.com - this one offers FREE downloads including Atomfilms Hi-Def
And of course, there are lots of free movies already available on Google Video, Veoh or other existing video sites. |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by cableties :$9.99?? Make it $2 and I'd think about it. Wait. No Thanks. I get Netflix and at the rate I watch films, it has to be "" $2 a movie. A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Between Netflix, Blockbuster, cable PPV, etc. offering these movies, anything higher than that from iTunes and the renters would be dummies for paying it. Exactly. Even $4 is ridiculously high compared to PPV which you can record. |
|
xmrocks
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-23
clubs:
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Agreed about the price. However, I still think it'll be a big success down the road. At first, I'm thinking iTunes/Apple will get slammed with criticism about it but still be a pioneer in that respect of bring movies to your desktop for a price (at least I know of know Mac-compatible sites for movie rentals/downloads at the current time though I'm sure there are Windows-based sites).
And people will rent the movies -- that's the thing. I agree they'd be dummies for doing it, but I have a hunch it'll be successful. Call me crazy
--
I don't tolerate phishing - >>phishtracker |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to cableties
said by cableties :$9.99?? Make it $2 and I'd think about it. Wait. No Thanks. I get Netflix and at the rate I watch films, it has to be "" $2 a movie. A rental in the $2 to $4 range is the max it should go. Between Netflix, Blockbuster, cable PPV, etc. offering these movies, anything higher than that from iTunes and the renters would be dummies for paying it.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page |
|
