Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » BitTorrent 4.20 Released » Will ISPs cache illegal content
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
270
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
YES! »
« Blindly Cache content? Uh No!  
AuthorAll Replies


LaZ3R
Premium
join:2003-01-17
 Will ISPs cache illegal content

No.

End of this article

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
will ISPs cache ANY content?

with bit torrent in bed with hollywood, not sure I would want to use that client anyway.

lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness

join:2001-12-24
Canada
Legal liabilities, thus no.

Think RIAA and MPAA.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to nasadude
said by nasadude See Profile :

will ISPs cache ANY content?

I think yes. Especially if it allows them to avoid paying more money to the backbone networks. But it will obviously only be legal content, to the extent that they can determine whether it is legal or not. For example, cable companies have legal deals with Hollywood and the NHL and PGA, etc to deliver certain content online. If they can use bittorrent to do that at lower cost, they will consider it. At least Cohen hopes that is the case.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page

jarosoup

join:2003-01-14
·Qwest.net

reply to LaZ3R
So where is the caching software?

I still don't see how this is going to help as there is so much content on BT. Is everyone going to be downloading the same thing? I think not. Is BT going to pay ISPs for the multi-Tb disk arrays required to cache all of this stuff?


tsu9

join:2001-08-17
Wheeling, IL
reply to TKJunkMail
It will probably strictly be things they can secure lucrative deals to distribute content, if that.

Warez_Zealot
Rural land of the rising sun

join:2006-04-19
japan

reply to LaZ3R
said by LaZ3R See Profile :

No.

End of this article
Well as far as I know, caching would alleviate the seeds on their network (paying clients) to upload less.

So if the content isn't available to the whole internet (just clients), I think they should do it...

Shaw, Cogeco, Rogers etc.. etc... are all little sniveling babies when it comes to bittorent. IMO they should jump on something like this so they can go back to sucking their thumbs and bottles..

The CRIA Gestapo is basically dead here, so there would be no real ramifications.. ATM anyhoo..


ssj4android
Redefining Reality

join:2002-04-14
Wyoming, MI
reply to lawrence171
The RIAA and MPAA haven't gone after USENET. Of course, it seems most providers are getting rid of USENET, at least most of the binaries groups.


Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
The first rule of USENET is to not talk about USENET.


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

reply to jarosoup
said by jarosoup See Profile :

So where is the caching software?

I still don't see how this is going to help as there is so much content on BT. Is everyone going to be downloading the same thing? I think not. Is BT going to pay ISPs for the multi-Tb disk arrays required to cache all of this stuff?
Hell, ISPs cant even do USENET decent let alone anything like BT caching. Although it would be nice to download at my cap speed rather than 5kb/s.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

reply to Michieru2
said by Michieru2 See Profile :

The first rule of USENET is to not talk about USENET.
Nope. The first rule of USENET is there are no rules, post what you want including spam and troll bait.
--
My pbase gallery

yabos

join:2003-02-16
Ingersoll, ON
reply to LaZ3R
With the amount of content that must flow, it'll be absolutely impossible for them to cache a significant amount of it to make any difference. They'd probably have to have a 20TB cache handled by hundreds of servers.

Diddy1

join:2003-07-19
Sidney, NE

reply to jarosoup
said by jarosoup See Profile :

I still don't see how this is going to help as there is so much content on BT. Is everyone going to be downloading the same thing? I think not. Is BT going to pay ISPs for the multi-Tb disk arrays required to cache all of this stuff?
My thoughts exactly!
djhurt1


Anon21123

@co.uk

reply to TKJunkMail
What you have to then ask yourself is if they do cache illegal content will they then fall victim to the RIAA and MPAA for illegal distribution, probably so would you allow your business to cache data that could end you up in court.

I think not.......


Anonynon

@co.uk
reply to ssj4android
The RIAA and MPAA HAVE AND ARE going after usenet.... Where have you been?
Forums » BitTorrent 4.20 ReleasedYES! »
« Blindly Cache content? Uh No!  


Friday, 27-Nov 18:40:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [111] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [57] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Vista] Why is HD So Full? [Microsoft Help]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· New exploit masquerades as Flash Player upgrade [Security]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]