Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Regulates VoIP » Can the FCC do this?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
41
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
yep »
« Cut the fraud first  
AuthorAll Replies


jjoshua
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ
Can the FCC do this?

Pardon the ignorance but...

Where does the FCC get the authority to regulate VOIP?

VOIP companies are service providers connected to the internet. They don't provide the connections. Why, then, are they regulated by the FCC?


celeritypc
For Lucky Best Wash, Use Mr. Sparkle
Premium
join:2004-05-15
Caldwell, NJ

said by jjoshua See Profile :

Pardon the ignorance but...

Where does the FCC get the authority to regulate VOIP?

VOIP companies are service providers connected to the internet. They don't provide the connections. Why, then, are they regulated by the FCC?
I can smell the court challenge already.


quetwo
That VoIP Guy
Premium
join:2004-09-04
East Lansing, MI
reply to jjoshua
Because they are connected to the PSTN, which is regulated by the FCC....


dcurrey
Premium
join:2004-06-29
·ViaTalk

Along those lines given the fact that Voip are service providers that just happen to connect to POTS network should the USF be sent to companies that provide DIDs to voip companies.

Example Level 3 has to pay for revenue generated from the sell of voip service to say Vonage. Now given the fact that Vonage is probably only paying at most 2 or 3 dollars for the number this would seriously reduce the USF cost. Level3 passes the cost to Vonage. Vonage can then eat the cost since its such a small amount or pass it on.


jjoshua
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ

2 edits
Exactly. Level3 should pay into the USF. VoIP companies are only end-users of the POTS lines and should not have to pay.

neftv

join:2000-10-01
Broomall, PA
No that will start a domino effect. Making Level 3 pay fee will then in turn they add that on to what their customers pay then it ends up to you and I paying it anyway. This has to be stopped at the source not at the victim side.


dcurrey
Premium
join:2004-06-29
True but a least this way the fee is only being based on a couple bucks. Lesser of two evils.

neftv

join:2000-10-01
Broomall, PA
I can't accept that. Everyone must contact their representatives and complain.
Forums » FCC Regulates VoIPyep »
« Cut the fraud first  


Sunday, 22-Nov 20:07:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [205] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [97] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [93] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [85] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [75] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [67] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· [NFL] Week 11 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· Why do cats... [General Questions]
· Hacking.....seriously, how easy is it to get hacked? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.2 Mage PVE [World of Warcraft]
· transfer switch location/space limitation [Home Repair & Improvement]
· TekSavvy Price Increase? [TekSavvy]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [ Professions] Northrend Herbalism and Mining Tracks [World of Warcraft]