republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Interview: Fighting AT&T » Summary of interview; as I see it
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Why is ATT even bothering? »
« who cares?  
AuthorAll Replies

ross

join:2000-08-16
·Digizip

reply to dadarkside
Re: Summary of interview; as I see it

Au contraire, cable companies LOVE franchise agreements. Those agreements were/are their butress against competition. While they haven't liked providing local access channels and public programing, they have made a killing by having exclusive agreements territorializing the market.

They really don't like the Telcos having unfettered access to what was formally their exclusive domain.


DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
·Charter Pipeline

reply to dadarkside
Don't split hairs. Read what I wrote in context with what insomniac84 See Profile wrote.
--
:: my trivial ramblings ::

dadarkside
Premium
join:2006-05-20
The Moon

reply to DaSneaky1D
said by DaSneaky1D See Profile :

Cable companies already do. It's called franchise agreements
Cable companies don't set these, these are negotiated with the municipality in which the cable company seeks to do business.

In fact, Cable companies dn't LIKE franchise agreements, they are often used as a tool to extract EXTRA services from the cable company.


DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
reply to insomniac84
Cable companies already do. It's called franchise agreements


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

I don't think a city government should have the power to force rules on a provider as to who they serve.
Why? A city should set whatever rules they want. If they mandate that any company that wants to roll out a new service needs to offer it to everyone, that is there right. The town will either win with companies offering products to everyone, or lose with no companies offering anything because they don't want to offer the product everywhere. In the end, as long as any money can be made if a product is rolled out to every house, the companies will still do it. It's just angers them when a small rural fraction will cost as much to setup as everyone else combined.
Personally I think more towns need to start requiring full deployment by telephone and cable companies. Otherwise the sparse areas will never get service.
Forums » Interview: Fighting AT&TWhy is ATT even bothering? »
« who cares?  


Wednesday, 25-Nov 23:53:05 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [105] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [94] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [94] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [58] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [48] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [33] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
Most people now reading
· Shutting of Electricity Temporarily (up to 1 yr) to Save $$$ [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Fiber to the Premises [Comcast HSI]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]