anonymostest
@38.115.x.x | Why is ATT even bothering?
Just send the trucks deploying fiber down here to Joliet/Plainfield, I won't fight you. Why bother fighting 1 community right now when there are so many communities that haven't had deployment yet? Stupid idiots. |
|
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
 ·XMission
| said by anonymostest :
Why bother fighting 1 community right now when there are so many communities that haven't had deployment yet? Stupid idiots.
Because EVERY successful build out done by a CITY makes the Tel/Cablecos look bad. Must nip the problem in the bud at all costs least the PEOPLE discover that big corporations have no concern for the people/community, just the upper crust of the company and a few top shareholders.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
cbrigante2
Cubs 20??
Premium
join:2002-11-22
North Aurora, IL
| reply to anonymostest
said by anonymostest :
Just send the trucks deploying fiber down here to Joliet/Plainfield, I won't fight you. Why bother fighting 1 community right now when there are so many communities that haven't had deployment yet? Stupid idiots.
I love these type posts. I agree with you, have AT&T go down to Joliet and start to cherry-pick who gets served and who doesn't since you don't seem to think a franchise agreement is needed. Cross all your fingers and toes and pray you are part of the served, then wonder why you thought you wanted this already outdated technology so bad. |
|
cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX
| said by cbrigante2  :said by anonymostest :
Just send the trucks deploying fiber down here to Joliet/Plainfield, I won't fight you. Why bother fighting 1 community right now when there are so many communities that haven't had deployment yet? Stupid idiots.
I love these type posts. I agree with you, have AT&T go down to Joliet and start to cherry-pick who gets served and who doesn't since you don't seem to think a franchise agreement is needed. Cross all your fingers and toes and pray you are part of the served, then wonder why you thought you wanted this already outdated technology so bad. Why should they build out what is needed when not enough will purchase the service to make it profitable or even pay for itself. Maybe those areas that cant afford the should just get free service? Who do you want to subsidize this development. |
|
cbrigante2
Cubs 20??
Premium
join:2002-11-22
North Aurora, IL
| said by cwh :said by cbrigante2 :said by anonymostest :
Just send the trucks deploying fiber down here to Joliet/Plainfield, I won't fight you. Why bother fighting 1 community right now when there are so many communities that haven't had deployment yet? Stupid idiots.
I love these type posts. I agree with you, have AT&T go down to Joliet and start to cherry-pick who gets served and who doesn't since you don't seem to think a franchise agreement is needed. Cross all your fingers and toes and pray you are part of the served, then wonder why you thought you wanted this already outdated technology so bad. Why should they build out what is needed when not enough will purchase the service to make it profitable or even pay for itself. Maybe those areas that cant afford the should just get free service? Who do you want to subsidize this development. AT&T argued the private model to help shut down the municipal vote. All subsidizing of this build-out should come from AT&T. |
|
