RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to GhostDoggy
Re: Its a lawless town, in D.C.
The FCC rarely enforces their own rules these days. Why does anyone think they'd take this one on?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
tsu9
join:2001-08-17
Wheeling, IL | One of these days, they'll have to do something.  |
|
Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc  :The FCC rarely enforces their own rules these days. Well, maybe if we say that there's boobies being shown by the NSA, we'll have some FCC action.  |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Now there's an idea. I think you could clearly illustrate that the number of boobs in this fiasco is a threat to the very moral fabric of our society.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
TheWickerMan
join:2002-04-09
Enola, PA
| reply to Thaler
said by Thaler :said by RadioDoc :The FCC rarely enforces their own rules these days. Well, maybe if we say that there's boobies being shown by the NSA, we'll have some FCC action. Most of the people in the NSA, as well as the entire government, ARE boobs. Shouldn't that count for something? |
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL
| reply to RadioDoc
As much as I dislike most of what the FCC does, I think the commissioner is right.
If you are going to make an allegation that the NSA is illegally plying their trade domestically it would have to be heard in the FISA court since they are the only judiciary with the necessary clearances. If the FISA court determines it does involve national security you likely won't hear anything about it.
I also think this has turned into a debate that can't be won by either side just like the debate on the existence of UFOs. Even if this makes it into the courts and the courts find it didn't happen, some will continue to believe the call records were turned over, simply because they are partisan or they don't trust the government.
On the other hand if the law was really broken and there is proof that extends beyond hearsay and innuendo, those responsible should be held to account. |
|
insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN | reply to RadioDoc
All the FCC cares about is boobies. |
|
averagedude
join:2002-01-30
Mesa, AZ | reply to RadioDoc
A true LOL moment. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to lesopp
said by lesopp :As much as I dislike most of what the FCC does, I think the commissioner is right. If you are going to make an allegation that the NSA is illegally plying their trade domestically it would have to be heard in the FISA court since they are the only judiciary with the necessary clearances. If the FISA court determines it does involve national security you likely won't hear anything about it. I also think this has turned into a debate that can't be won by either side just like the debate on the existence of UFOs. Even if this makes it into the courts and the courts find it didn't happen, some will continue to believe the call records were turned over, simply because they are partisan or they don't trust the government. On the other hand if the law was really broken and there is proof that extends beyond hearsay and innuendo, those responsible should be held to account. I think the Dems will win in this one by continuing to talk about it. Don't get me wrong, it's definitely a complete violation of constiutional authority. |
|
cob_
1310nm Of Goodness
Premium
join:2003-07-08
Tulsa, OK
| reply to Thaler
said by Thaler :said by RadioDoc :The FCC rarely enforces their own rules these days. Well, maybe if we say that there's boobies being shown by the NSA, we'll have some FCC action. Sad, but true. |
|
SparkChaser
BURY BECK
Premium
join:2000-06-06
Downingtown, PA
·Verizon FIOS
 ·Comcast
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc :I think you could clearly illustrate that the number of boobs in this fiasco is a threat to the very moral fabric of our society. Well put
--
Hard work never killed anybody but why should I take the chance |
|
