mazilo
From Mazilo
Premium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA
| reply to NowVOIP
Re: [General] VOIP and FOIP Information
What I never understand is how hard for the VoIP industries to make a dedicated FoIP through TCP instead of UDP. With TCP, packets can be retransmitted if they didn't reach the destination. This way, the FAX is ensured to reach its destination. Since FAX doesn't need to be in a real-time transmission, it is OK with TCP.
--
Mazi (UK Non-Geo Phone: +44-703-194-2574) |
|
NowVOIP
In the beginning there was POTS
join:2006-03-05
Round Lake, IL
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| said by mazilo  :What I never understand is how hard for the VoIP industries to make a dedicated FoIP through TCP instead of UDP. With TCP, packets can be retransmitted if they didn't reach the destination. This way, the FAX is ensured to reach its destination. Since FAX doesn't need to be in a real-time transmission, it is OK with TCP. Good question, i dont know about that. |
|
roamer1
sticking it out at you
join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:
| reply to mazilo
said by mazilo :What I never understand is how hard for the VoIP industries to make a dedicated FoIP through TCP instead of UDP. TCP increases jitter, which is a Bad Thing.
-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend |
|
