Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Networking » [Connection Sharing] VPN endpoint for multiple segments
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
77
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Other] Is My Wireless Netwok Card Gone? »
« [winxp] Remote desktop and multiple pc's issues  
AuthorAll Replies


new-to-networking

@mindspring.com

[Connection Sharing] VPN endpoint for multiple segments

hi:
i m trying to setup a multiple segments and VPN for the office LAN. here it goes:

modem-> ROUTER1 (WAN:dhcp LAN:10.10.10.1)>Router2 (WAN:10.10.10.2 LAN:192.168.0.1)- switch (VLAN1: 192.168.0.x, VLAN2: 192.168.1.X)

1)if i put the VPN endpoint, such as PPTP server on router 1, will the outside see the WHOLE segments on ROUTER2 ???
if so, how can i do so?
2) or If i put the PPTP server on ROUTER 2 , Router 1 enable PPTP passthru, port forwarding to Router2, will this also see the whole segment?

The reason is that some employees gotta get back the files from the server at home. the server is on 192.168.0.x domain.
thank you.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

Properly configured, you could put the PPTP server under ROUTER1 or ROUTER2. For convienence, simplicity, and performance, under ROUTER1 probably would be best. However there are design and security reasons why you might want to put it under ROUTER2 on one of the VLANs.

Without more information as to how the network is setup, why are doing double NAT (if my presumption is correct), physical infrastructure, etc, it's hard to give you a better suggestion as to where to stick it.
--
"What gives them the right to come in and do this?" she said. - Lady complaining that she was getting FIOS in her backyard.


new-to-networking

@mindspring.com

i m not doing double NAT, but static routing on router2. the reason is that router1 has filtering policies, firewall rules, yet router2 has the QOS, VLAN, pptp server and wireless....so i m trying to combine them together without using double NAT.

i will also host a web server soon , putting it onto DMZ, so i believe the router1 is the primary boundary DMZ zone, the router2 is the internal boundary using static routing....
is this good?
Forums » Up and Running » Networking[Other] Is My Wireless Netwok Card Gone? »
« [winxp] Remote desktop and multiple pc's issues  


Monday, 09-Nov 07:06:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [109] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [81] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Security Software Updates - 09 Nov 2009 [Security]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Linux iso download appreciation day [TekSavvy]
· Anti Virus Program? Tried Avast-Looking For Better Program [Security]