 rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04 USA
| Re: BPL said by Slacker44 :No reason for HAMS. None. N O N E. Let's say for a moment that your argument is valid, that ham radio has no value whatsoever. Does it make sense to ruin a wide swath of radio spectrum that has worldwide communications capabilities, and the ruin of this resource is due to a wired network that doesn't even use the wireless spectrum to provide the service?
The answer is NO. N O | |
|
 Slacker44
join:2001-05-10 Gilbert, AZ | Re: BPL That is a better argument than the disaster card. Atleast I can respect that. | |
|
 |  N3EVL
join:2004-12-13 Shrewsbury, MA | Re: BPL So, now your respect has been earned, exactly what do you propose as a solution to the spectrum pollution presently taking place in the Manassas system? | |
|
 |  |
 |
|
 |