Re: BPL - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
rf_engineer join:2003-08-04 USA	reply to Slacker44 Re: BPL said by Slacker44 : No reason for HAMS. None. N O N E. Let's say for a moment that your argument is valid, that ham radio has no value whatsoever. Does it make sense to ruin a wide swath of radio spectrum that has worldwide communications capabilities, and the ruin of this resource is due to a wired network that doesn't even use the wireless spectrum to provide the service? The answer is NO. N O
rf_engineer join:2003-08-04 USA	to forum · permalink · · 2006-01-26 17:33:35 ·
Slacker44 join:2001-05-10 Gilbert, AZ	That is a better argument than the disaster card. Atleast I can respect that.
Slacker44 join:2001-05-10 Gilbert, AZ	to forum · permalink · · 2006-01-26 17:37:08 ·
N3EVL join:2004-12-13 Shrewsbury, MA	So, now your respect has been earned, exactly what do you propose as a solution to the spectrum pollution presently taking place in the Manassas system?
N3EVL join:2004-12-13 Shrewsbury, MA	to forum · permalink · · 2006-01-26 17:46:47 ·
packetscan Premium join:2004-10-19 Bridgeport, CT clubs: ·Optimum Online	reply to Slacker44 said by Slacker44 : That is a better argument than the disaster card. Atleast I can respect that. Then what should we use to communicate in a disaster? Smoke Signals? Your comments are inflammatory and completely biased against hams. -- Who do you want to pay off today?
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-01-26 20:04:15 ·


Thursday, 08-Jan 01:40:32	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF