vipergg
join:2003-12-17
| reply to altu
Re: [Config] Secondary VLAN issue
I guess I'm a little confused on the setup , don't understand why you have the application server doing routing also along with the 3750 . Also a little confused on other posters comments about trunking . You can certainly run both sides as transparent as long as you don't want to run the client/server setup where the server controls the adding of vlans to the domain . If you both sides are transparent you just have to manually create the vlans on both sides , we do it all the time . Maybe I misunderstood what he was saying. |
|
aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22
| It is always a good practise for a VTP Domain to have VTP Server. Aside of avoiding manual creations of VLANs, you might have growing Spanning Tree problem without a presence of VTP Server. The following is detail on VTP and Spanning Tree Protocol (STP):
»www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/t···52.shtml |
|
