Anav
Sarcastic Llama? Naw, Just Acerbic
Premium
join:2001-07-16
Dartmouth, NS | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released Then Brano would be correct. | |
|
 
bbarrera
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
clubs: | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released Yes, Brano's post was in agreement with my earlier post. | |
|
 | 
jig
join:2001-01-05
Hacienda Heights, CA | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released hmm. why is it hard coded? seems like something worth being able to change. | |
|
| | Shootist
Premium
join:2003-02-10
Decatur, GA
| Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released said by jig  :hmm. why is it hard coded? seems like something worth being able to change. Well you can change it, up to the MAX allowed. Which on the Z5 is now 4000. It uses to be 6000. No real biggy being at 4000 for normal use. 4000 should handle many users with normal browsing and a couple of users with heavy P2P use.
--
Shooter Ready--Stand By BEEP ******** | |
|
| | |
jig
join:2001-01-05
Hacienda Heights, CA | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released ah, ok. so for single home use, probably plenty.
just wondering, is there a way to get current sessions on an old rt314? | |
|
| | | | Shootist
Premium
join:2003-02-10
Decatur, GA
| Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released Well even for a business with ?# users, maybe 40-60+. Normal web browsing doesn't use up a lot of NAT session. It's when you have 2-3-4-5-6 people using a P2P app that eat away at them.
--
Shooter Ready--Stand By BEEP ******** | |
|
| | | | |
jig
join:2001-01-05
Hacienda Heights, CA | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released well.... home use with some p2p... | |
|
| | | | | |
jig
join:2001-01-05
Hacienda Heights, CA | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released
i guess my only hesitation is that whoever decided on nat sessions for the 551 thought that 16000 was appropriate...
? | |
|
| | | | | | | Shootist
Premium
join:2003-02-10
Decatur, GA
| Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released I don't know about anyone else but the most Nat sessions I ever used was with 2 P2P apps running, Limewire and WinMX, doing multiple searches on both and multiple downloads on both I got to something like 3700. Not sure if you could ever get to 16000 on a home connection anytime in the near future. Ok Yes you could have the fastest connection on the planet for home use but just how many people will have that type of connection. And with the way things are going P2P could be dead anytime in the near future.
--
Shooter Ready--Stand By BEEP ******** | |
|
| | | | | | | |
jig
join:2001-01-05
Hacienda Heights, CA
1 edit | Re: ZyWall 5 V4.00 (XD.2) released said by Shootist :I don't know about anyone else but the most Nat sessions I ever used was with 2 P2P apps running, Limewire and WinMX, doing multiple searches on both and multiple downloads on both I got to something like 3700. Not sure if you could ever get to 16000 on a home connection anytime in the near future. Ok Yes you could have the fastest connection on the planet for home use but just how many people will have that type of connection. And with the way things are going P2P could be dead anytime in the near future. i doubt that very much (the last).
how do limewire and winmx stack up against 3 or 4 large torrents all going at the same time?
actually, can i just get an idea of sessions open by running netstat -an on a win machine? or maybe tcpview? or are there usually a bunch of orphaned nat sessions left in the table of the router for a long time?
edit->well, after running the command "ip nat iface enif1 st" on my old rt314, i see that its table size is 256... and doesn't that correspond to the number of nat sessions?
maybe i'm worrying about nothing important. | |
|
| | | | | | |
Anav
Sarcastic Llama? Naw, Just Acerbic
Premium
join:2001-07-16
Dartmouth, NS
1 edit | The X-550 is a gaming oriented home router with the addition of MIMO, comparing to SMB is really not that useful.
Concur, WAN to WLAN should be drop by default!!
Please use the z70 demo link to view the firewall defaults page..........
»New INTERACTIVE ZYWALL 70 DEMO | |
|
|
|
|
