Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » New Netgear Wireless Router » who cares?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Cool! »
AuthorAll Replies

v_lestat
The Blood Is The Life

join:2002-11-09

reply to twizlar
Re: who cares?

said by twizlar See Profile :

The people that will really benefit from this are LARGE wireless networks. Where there are several hundred users on an access point at a time. This will dramatically increase the speeds available to the end user when in large WLAN environments.
I guarentee you 150% that there is no end user regular joe piece of hardware out there right now that will handle "several hundred users" who are all on at the same time. your not going to buy anything wireless from netgear that will handle that many people.
It nt a bandwidth limitation its a hardware limitation.
They can claim it can handle such-n-such users but i sell this stuff for a living every day (not this whimpy netgear or linksys stuff) and i guarentee you that these pieces of hardware will puke out you get that many people.

thruput starts backing down on many devies when you start getting a dozen or more users let alone a hundred or more.

these are designed for in your home with 3-4 users and thats all.

plus i'd love to see how far they actually got away from the AP to get those speeds.

and don't start in on the WiMax stuff either. It's not even been ratified yet and is still in its first stages of "stage 1" finalization. Infact today they are doing their stage 1.
And here in the USA we are fighting with the FCC to get the GHZ bands finalized and we are running into issues.
Also make note that Intel has backed out of all wimax products that are NOT licensed bands meaning anything that you can go buy and hook up- without an FCC license,, intel has said they wont make the chipsets for them. So hows that for intel strong arming yet again!
--
System SpecsAMD64 3200+ Venice @2.75ghz Water CooledMSI NEO2 Plat 1gig OCZ PC4000 -Modded Audigy2 ZS w/ 3 AD8620 OPAMPS chips -2x 36gig Raptors + 120gigeVGA 6800 Ultra WaterCooledLogitech Z5300 THX 5.1 spk


knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service

said by v_lestat See Profile :

said by twizlar See Profile :

The people that will really benefit from this are LARGE wireless networks. Where there are several hundred users on an access point at a time. This will dramatically increase the speeds available to the end user when in large WLAN environments.
I guarentee you 150% that there is no end user regular joe piece of hardware out there right now that will handle "several hundred users" who are all on at the same time. your not going to buy anything wireless from netgear that will handle that many people.
It nt a bandwidth limitation its a hardware limitation.
They can claim it can handle such-n-such users but i sell this stuff for a living every day (not this whimpy netgear or linksys stuff) and i guarentee you that these pieces of hardware will puke out you get that many people.

thruput starts backing down on many devies when you start getting a dozen or more users let alone a hundred or more.

these are designed for in your home with 3-4 users and thats all.

plus i'd love to see how far they actually got away from the AP to get those speeds.

and don't start in on the WiMax stuff either. It's not even been ratified yet and is still in its first stages of "stage 1" finalization. Infact today they are doing their stage 1.
And here in the USA we are fighting with the FCC to get the GHZ bands finalized and we are running into issues.
Also make note that Intel has backed out of all wimax products that are NOT licensed bands meaning anything that you can go buy and hook up- without an FCC license,, intel has said they wont make the chipsets for them. So hows that for intel strong arming yet again!
I beg to differ, I setup a 100 user wireless network at an office using a run of the mill netgear 54 Mbps wireless router. It's a financial company that has very heavy network usage to file servers, printers, etc. It works just fine, no problems at all.

Experience trumphs logic in this example


twizlar
I dont think so.
Premium
join:2003-12-24
Brantford, ON
reply to v_lestat
Too bad i wasn't talking about consumer level products. I mean the technology itself will help out large wans in regards to users and bandwidth.
--
AMD Athlon64 3500+ @ 2521mhz - mountaincable.net wireless Intarweb |Ipods SUCK
Forums » New Netgear Wireless RouterCool! »


Monday, 09-Nov 04:22:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [109] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Lots of problems lately? [Rogers]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Upcoming Games for 2009 [PC gaming GAMES]
· Can no longer send email [AT&T Southwest]