JoeOnSunset
Doublethink Is Doubleplus Ungood.
Premium
join:2002-11-25
Ormond Beach, FL
| reply to Noah Vail
Re: And the winner is.......
Even if there were more 'liberal' reporters than 'conservative,' which would be an overwhelmingly simplistic view, it doesn't mean the news media is liberal.
The news media is a complex system and the journalists and reporters are beholden to much bigger forces than their own personal politics. Namely the forces I described in my post. |
|
Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to tiger72
Will a comparison between Dem and Non-Dem do for you?
Well there is this 1995 poll by the Roper Center for the Freedom Forum showed that 89 percent of Washington reporters polled voted for Bill Clinton. (RC is partnered by NYT, WPst and others.) That's about double the percentage of the country that voted for him. Not exactly a representative sample of US citizens.
And then there's a survey by the American Association of Newspaper Editors of over 1000 journalists in 1996 found that 61% of newsroom staffers identified themselves as Liberal/Democratic while only 15% were Conservative/Republican.
You can stick Libertarian journalists (both of them) anywhere you want in there and it won't change the outcome.
There's this nifty tidbit unearthed by NYT journalist John Tierney prior to the 2004 election showing a 3to1 preference for Kerry by journalists assigned to cover the election and a 12to1 preference for Kerry by journalists inside the beltway. There are several other instances in the article illustrating bias.
Sorry, I have to give a Google Cache link unless you want to pay for NYT archive browsing.
»64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:oy···22&hl=en
These journalist preference ratios are WAY off election results. They are nowhere near a representative sampling of the American Public.
What percentage of Americans are registered Libertarians? What percentage of Journalists are registered Libertarians? Blessed few I'd bet. I doubt they have any meaningful effect on the above numbers.
I'll wait here for your numbers that show that there really are as many conservatives as there are liberals in journalism.
NV |
|
tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
 ·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Noah Vail
Re: More Myths?
said by Noah Vail  :Well, I'm certain that having 75%-90% Journalists identifying themselves as Democrats vs. >10% Republicans has NO EFFECT AT ALL on our news coverage. Since you have so many opinions not backed up with fact i'm just going to point this one thing out: Find a poll that's not limited to 2 parties and includes "Libertarians" as a choice for those reporters and I can guarantee that the outcome will look quite different.
Come to the Red Room and maybe you can find folks who support your frame of mind more readily, however even then some of the Libertarians and Moderates may still ask you for sources.
--
In a fascist government, National Security ALWAYS override Personal Freedoms. |
|
Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to JoeOnSunset
Sheesh! First I find the Moon Landings are myths, then Auschwitz, now this!
Well, now that I am fully enlightened we can assume that if the current president had a D after his name there would be NO DIFFERENCE in the war coverage.
We can certainly evidence that by reading back all the negative editorials and constant stream of negatively focused bylines that were written about Somalia and Mogadishu......
all that negative press......hmm.
Well, it was there. Right between 540-Rooms for Rent and 560-Geriatric Supplies.
huh.
Well there was all that doom and gloom press before we went into Bosnia and Serbia like before we went into Iraq. And then constant second guessing Clinton while the wars went on.
Oh? None?
I guess the NYT-LAt-WAPst missed those wars. Well they probably had a charity event that weekend.
Well they certainly nailed Clinton to the tree for that Aspirin Factory bombing. Wheh! CBS must have covered that for 10, maybe 15 seconds! But it was a SCATHING 15 seconds.
Well, at least Newsweek covered the Sitting President - Lewinski thing with the same gusto they covered the George Bush DWI of 20 years ago.
No wait. Newsweek initially tried to bury the Lewinski story. Sorry. Forgot about that.
Well, I'm certain that having 75%-90% Journalists identifying themselves as Democrats vs. >10% Republicans has NO EFFECT AT ALL on our news coverage.
Oh! The #1 reason given in college to become a journalist?
"I want to help change the world"
Hmmm.
NV
--
Abortion: It's really a Republican plot to thin the liberal herd! |
|
JoeOnSunset
Doublethink Is Doubleplus Ungood.
Premium
join:2002-11-25
Ormond Beach, FL
| reply to Noah Vail
Re: Yea, don't blame ya......
The idea of a liberal news media is a myth. It is an truly brilliant construction of the right. Imagine calling the news media that was heralding Bush throughout all of his missteps these past years "liberally biased." It's brilliant! Anything short of utter suppliance to the party line gets labeled "biased."
In reality: The big news media are lazy, and like to report what everyone else is reporting. They are timid, and don't like to critcize things that are popular. Finally, they are greedy, and love to report anything they think will make people watch. (That is, unless they are specifically created to serve an agenda, like Fox News.) |
|
