Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Microsoft Loses With Eolas Patent Ruling » ridiculous
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Sue Mozilla? »
« Here's a Little History  
AuthorAll Replies

IOddity

join:2005-06-06
Rio Dell, CA
reply to aelfwyne
Re: ridiculous

Hm, in 1999 my browser had just discovered images, programs being called from within the browser doesn't seem a very obvious extension of the technology at the time. Hell, I was just glad to find out that there was more than text to browsing.


Vchat20
Landing is the REAL challenge

join:2003-09-16
Warren, OH
clubs:

you are kinda late. IE4 and up afaik has had image support and my circa '98 computer was preloaded with IE5. and im sure that image support was availble in windows 95 cuz our old computers back in elementary had them and they were able to browse image-laiden web pages.

but thats besides the original point. just trying to correct you a bit.
--
Alec Trebek: Well, all you had to do was write down a number. And you wrote... Threeve. A combination of three and five. Simply stunning. And you wagered... Texas with a dollar sign in front of it. I'm speechless.

IOddity

join:2005-06-06
Rio Dell, CA
Yeah, I was late getting my graphics, was using a unix system at my school. Pine was my email, Lynx was www.

b10010011
Whats a Posting tag?

join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA
reply to IOddity
Oh come on!
Netscape for Windows 3.1 had full graphics back in 1990!

IOddity

join:2005-06-06
Rio Dell, CA
Windows 3.1 didn't even hit til around beginning of '92 if I recall correctly. What are you smokin?


baby_bear

@comcast.net
  He's GW'in (ie clueless).

Netscape Ver 1.0 Final didn't exist till Dec. of '94


cao1964

join:2000-08-09
Danville, PA

reply to IOddity
said by IOddity See Profile :

Windows 3.1 didn't even hit til around beginning of '92 if I recall correctly. What are you smokin?
I think that was 3.1 For workgroup, maybe it was 3.11 or something like that.

b10010011
Whats a Posting tag?

join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA
reply to IOddity
Windows 3.1 (originally codenamed Janus), released on March 18, 1992.

You are right, but by 93 there was full graphical web browsers for Windows 3.1.

What a long strange trip its been:D

BIGHUSKER

join:2002-01-20
Minneapolis, MN

reply to IOddity
said by IOddity See Profile :

Hm, in 1999 my browser had just discovered images
Were you surfing on lynx in 1999? Images have been around almost since the dawn of the web...they were definitely there when I was surfing away at 28.8 in 1996.
Forums » Microsoft Loses With Eolas Patent RulingSue Mozilla? »
« Here's a Little History  


Sunday, 08-Nov 13:31:36 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Odd Memory Issue [Computer Hardware Help]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· no Globalive/Wind Mobile in Canada [TekSavvy]