republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U.S. Vs. World in Internet Governance Fight » We Paid For It
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
120
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Who Cares »
« The results are in  
AuthorAll Replies


n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
·Optimum Online

We Paid For It

The U.S. taxpayer built the Internet by funding the ARPANET. There was nothing to prevent some foreign technology such as the French Minitel system from having been adopted worldwide. We just had the better system. If the E.U. or U.N. wants something to govern, they are certainly free to go out and spend some money and develop their own private version of the Internet. In fact, because the E.U. could not control GPS they are planning to build there own version called Galileo. So why not go all the way and build a new Internet as well? In fact, if they adopt IPV6 from the start, they could pretty much guarantee the U.S. will not be on board ! While oversight by the ITU would probably be acceptable since they have done a very good job with telephone and radio, it would still be subject to the whims of the U.N. and that would be a non-starter.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by n2jtx See Profile :

While oversight by the ITU would probably be acceptable since they have done a very good job with telephone and radio, it would still be subject to the whims of the U.N. and that would be a non-starter.
Can you explain how it would be "subject to the whims of the U.N."?

The ITU operates under its own multi-lateral treaty (i.e., Convention and Constitution), has a separate membership, and a separate budget.

I sure hope no one ever tells folks here that another U.N. Specialized Agency is already responsible for settling Domain Name trademark disputes (WIPO); they'd have a heart attack.


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online

said by PDXPLT See Profile :

The ITU operates under its own multi-lateral treaty (i.e., Convention and Constitution), has a separate membership, and a separate budget.
Ssssshhhh.... stop talking sense. We're busy bashing the UN here.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to PDXPLT
said by PDXPLT See Profile :

I sure hope no one ever tells folks here that another U.N. Specialized Agency is already responsible for settling Domain Name trademark disputes (WIPO); they'd have a heart attack.
We've seen what a disaster that has been. Do we want more of that for the Internet at large?
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to n2jtx
said by n2jtx See Profile :

The U.S. taxpayer built the Internet by funding the ARPANET.
The only chance of something as stupid as giving the UN control of the Internet would occur if Jimmy Carter was ever re-elected President. He had no qualms about giving away U.S. taxpayer built things like the Panama Canal after all.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by n2jtx See Profile :

The U.S. taxpayer built the Internet by funding the ARPANET.
The only chance of something as stupid as giving the UN control of the Internet would occur if Jimmy Carter was ever re-elected President. He had no qualms about giving away U.S. taxpayer built things like the Panama Canal after all.
So how do you give away something that is a collection of private networks? Some owned by ferners, I might add...

So in a round about way I guess you guys are thanking the Dems for pushing for NSFNet, huh? Good for you! It worked out pretty well, didn't it?


LinuxJunkie

join:2005-01-19
Cyberspace

reply to sporkme
Since you have such a great perspective on things, tell me why we should feel obligated to hand over the creative control to something that WE spent time developing, WE spent our own money to develop and that WE have allowed other countries to access since it was privatized? Just like a bunch of crackheads on welfare, the other "nations" in the U.N. want all the benefits without having to do any of the work.


LinuxJunkie

join:2005-01-19
Cyberspace
reply to sporkme
Yeah, it worked out great. The NSFnet was disbanded in 1995. What a phenomenal waste of money!


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US

reply to LinuxJunkie
said by LinuxJunkie See Profile :

Since you have such a great perspective on things, tell me why we should feel obligated to hand over the creative control to something that WE spent time developing, WE spent our own money to develop and that WE have allowed other countries to access since it was privatized? Just like a bunch of crackheads on welfare, the other "nations" in the U.N. want all the benefits without having to do any of the work.
Perhaps because it's not true at all?

The very WWW is not American but European. So following your infected (il)logic please, STFU and hand it back.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by n2jtx See Profile :

The U.S. taxpayer built the Internet by funding the ARPANET.
The only chance of something as stupid as giving the UN control of the Internet would occur if Jimmy Carter was ever re-elected President. He had no qualms about giving away U.S. taxpayer built things like the Panama Canal after all.
Actually the disaster is here: we have a debil lunatic jesusfreak in the White House, surrounded by corporate crook war criminals with no military service whatsoever, playinjg wargames real-time.


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online

reply to LinuxJunkie
said by LinuxJunkie See Profile :

WE have allowed other countries to access since it was privatized? Just like a bunch of crackheads on welfare, the other "nations" in the U.N. want all the benefits without having to do any of the work.
What in God's name are you talking about? A private company is free to do business in whatever country it pleases. We "allow" other people to "buy" our "Internet"??? Where is anyone talking about wiring up all of Africa for free? This is about governance, and probably more accurately, DNS. What could possibly be any worse than ICANN?


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online

reply to LinuxJunkie
said by LinuxJunkie See Profile :

Yeah, it worked out great. The NSFnet was disbanded in 1995. What a phenomenal waste of money!
You're very short-sighted. Without NFSNet the Internet wouldn't exist. Do you know why it was disbanded? Because private enterprise took over and a government-funded education/research net was no longer needed. Do you not like private enterprise? Would you like a government-funded network?


Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net


2 edits
reply to kamm

A recent card Kamm got in the mail.
said by kamm See ProfileActually the disaster is here: we have a debil lunatic jesusfreak in the White House, surrounded by corporate crook war criminals with no military service whatsoever, playinjg wargames real-time.
:

This is Kamm's butchie boy. bung holes in love:D
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US


1 edit
You again? Uh-oh, still so funny...

Thanks for the evidence you aren't even adult, shouldn't be taken seriously.

PS: "The is Kamm's boy friend. it is true love." What language is this? It uses English words but no ocherence at all, doesn't make any sense whatsoever.


guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
·epix

reply to sporkme
said by sporkme See Profile :

What could possibly be any worse than ICANN?
Answer: The crackheads and the pajama clad pagans of the UN having control of the net.
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm.


Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net


1 edit
reply to kamm
Click for full size
Generational Heros
Kamm you should thank your lucky stars there are heros like those in the above photo that defend your right to hate everything the United States stands for. These Veteran's paid the price so you can freeload.


guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
·epix

said by Transmaster See Profile :

Kamm you should thank your lucky stars there are heros like those in the above photo that defend your right to hate everything the United States stands for. These Veteran's paid the price so you can freeload.
That is so true Transmaster and the foreign freeloaders, do not have any gratitude to even say thank you.Instead they are full of vinegar and piss.We are better off with out the UN and their side show freaks and UN supporters.However these ungrateful foreigners need the US more than we need them in the US. To gain what they otherwise could never attain in their own despotic countries,Who are so beloved and beholden by the UN
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm.


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

reply to kamm
said by kamm See Profile :

...
PS: "The is Kamm's boy friend. it is true love." What language is this? It uses English words but no ocherence at all, doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
What's "ocherence"?

Really. Spell check only takes one extra screen, and improves the appearance and credibility of your output. It is recommended.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


LinuxJunkie

join:2005-01-19
Cyberspace

reply to kamm
The basic protocols that RUN the 'net have been around since ARPAnet which WE developed and WE sank money into it. DNS would be absolutely fuggin' useless without IP being there in the first place. So why don't YOU STFU and "hand it back," whatever the f*ck that's supposed to mean.
Forums » U.S. Vs. World in Internet Governance FightWho Cares »
« The results are in  


Saturday, 21-Nov 18:49:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [116] Weekend Open Thread
· [90] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [84] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [84] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [71] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [66] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Hacking.....seriously, how easy is it to get hacked? [Security]
· [Rant] Verizon's Unfair Billing Practices [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Town to photograph EVERY car that enters and leaves [Security]
· You get ONE WoW wish... what would you do? [World of Warcraft]
· transfer switch location/space limitation [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Delivered Teksavvy flyers today + TSI Billboard seen in KW [TekSavvy]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]