Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Bell TV & the Death of Public Access » Abalone
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
What "public access" really is.... »
AuthorAll Replies

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

reply to SRFireside
Re: You want others to pay for your speech--why?

said by SRFireside See Profile :

Everybody has a right to be heard. Maybe not on television, but they have that right. You have a problem with your government? You have the right to speak up and bear your grievances. You have a problem with a company? You have the right to take it up to their office, and if they don't listen you have the right to take it to the media. In a democracy nobody is supposed to be silenced.
Wait a second -- where did this "right" come from?

All the Constitution implies is that the government can't restrict your right to speech (by passing a law, etc.)

Where do you get this idea that you have any "right to take it up to their office" in a company? As far as I know there has never been any such right. A company can EASILY bar you from the premises and tell you to screw off. Of course, you can always choose to sue them (or press criminal charges if applicable).

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX
Which ultimately means you do get your right to be heard. Can we get back on topic now?

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
There's a topic?

-- B


cowardly poster

@dsl-w.verizon


from:
SRFireside See Profile

reply to B
The right to free speech and the right to be heard are connected. If you remove the possibility of being heard than the right to free speech is an illusion. Therefore, the "right" of free speech implies a "possibility" of being heard, but not a "right" of being heard.

The community square (and it's counterpart, public access TV) does not provide a "right" of being heard (people can always walk away), but it does provide the "possibility" of being heard.

The cable company is charging you a fee to subsidize public access. So what? It's the business model that you've agreed to. You end up subsidizing ALL channels that you receive, whether you watch them or not. ESPN charges the cable TV company more than any other channel by far. If you don't watch ESPN, you are subsidizing anybody that does. When was the last time someone that watches ESPN thanked you for paying a little extra every month so that they could watch ESPN?

OK, so I occasionally watch public access, so thank you for paying a little extra every month so that I could watch public access.
Forums » Bell TV & the Death of Public AccessWhat "public access" really is.... »


Monday, 23-Nov 14:31:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [48] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [20] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [19] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [7] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [6] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [4] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· openSUSE 11.2 problems and solutions? [All Things Unix]
· CTV & Canwest ask CRTC to order blocking of U.S. programs [TekSavvy]
· Blocking telephone numbers. [General Questions]
· linux box alternative to NetEqualizer ? ? Does it exist? [Wireless Service Providers]