republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Google Building Massive Fiber Network » Likely?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
why??? »
« GoogleNET  
AuthorAll Replies

L2006

join:2001-12-03
Stratford, ON
reply to calvoiper
Re: Likely?

free ad-driven tv?

TV to the house should be free now... for every 20 min of television, there are 10 min of commercials it seems.

I mean, if commercials pay for the content, what is my huge monthly bill paying for?


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
uhhh, that was exactly my point. We had (actually, still have) free BROADCAST television, but most choose to pay for additional channels....

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Kansas City, MO
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

said by calvoiper See Profile :

uhhh, that was exactly my point. We had (actually, still have) free BROADCAST television, but most choose to pay for additional channels....

calvoiper
I think his point is that you still get ads on cable anyways - why are you paying for it?
--
In a fascist government, National Security ALWAYS trumps Personal Freedoms.»quackleducks.blogspot.com/

gpancner

join:2001-09-27
Nine Mile Falls, WA

reply to calvoiper
No such thing as Free BROADCAST TV

The amount of money spent on advertising over "Free" Broadcast TV adds over $600/year to the cost of living per capita in the U.S. via increased prices for goods purchased.
Have you ever seen a "Free" Broadcast TV station facility?
They didn't pull the constuction/operation money out of a hat.

Drex_CS

join:2005-05-11
canada
reply to L2006
Re: Likely?

you pay for them to broadcast it, the ads pay for the 6 million an episode cost taht friends had.. and other such shows.


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

OK, everybody, if you don't like "free" ad-driven services, don't watch or use them. What I don't understand is the attitude that others shouldn't be able to choose to use a service delivery mechanism just because you don't happen to like it.

Unless you are all ISP shills (which I doubt) I can't understand the hostility to the possibility of Google providing a "free", but ad-driven, wireless Internet access program. Could someone clue me in?

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Google Building Massive Fiber Networkwhy??? »
« GoogleNET  


Friday, 05-Dec 11:42:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [126] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [102] AT&T Cutting 12,000 Jobs
· [97] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [94] Exclusive Screens Of Comcast's New Bandwidth Meter
· [93] Scott Cleland: Google Using 21x The Bandwidth They Pay For
· [90] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [84] Firefox Extension Leads Amazon Customers To Pirated Alternatives
· [63] Apple: Who Believes Our Ads Anyway?
· [62] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [62] Comcast To Offer Bandwidth Use Tracker In January
Most people now reading
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· Always leave the Windows Firewall on? [Security]
· [WotLK] Hit Rating Cap - Hunters [World of Warcraft]
· Garage Door Track Pulled Off Wall? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· [ Professions] Northrend Herbalism and Mining Tracks [World of Warcraft]
· Security Cleanup - useless - according to Steve Gibson [Security]
· [game] Crazy Game Fun Time!!! [Pub Games]
· [Rant] Bestbuy receipt checker [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· WoTLK Heriocs [World of Warcraft]