republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Texas Eliminates Local Franchise Agreements » What's wrong?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Good bye to... »
« Politicians are so sold to special interests  
AuthorAll Replies

SanJoseNerd
Premium
join:2002-07-24
San Jose, CA

reply to cmscholloway
Re: What's wrong?

said by cmscholloway See Profile :

- The net result of this will be lost revenue to the city government (future revenue from SBC, and existing revenue from the Cable franchises).

- Cities, being the who they are, will have to make up for this revenue somehow (raise taxes, fees) or cut services.

Being a city dweller, I will now have to pay more taxes (or receive less services), whether I choose to subscribe to IPTV or not. This is EXACTLY the argument SBC uses against Municipal wireless.
Why is there lost revenue? Where I live, the city government taxes telephone service, but it doesn't regulate SBC nor does SBC have a franchise agreement. You don't need a franchise agreement to levy a tax on SBC.

cmscholloway

join:2005-01-05
Austin, TX

Since the city can no longer collect the franchise fees (from SBC and soon enough Time Warner), they will lose revenue. Because the franchise fee is collected at the State level, the cities won't be allowed to tax them "twice" for the same service.

In the Texas State legislature, the only way the interests of the people (and in this case Cities) are protected is when one huge corporation is opposed by another huge corporation. It's kind of like when the Eagles play the Redskins in the NFL. You wish there was a way that both teams could lose. Time Warner showed up at the Capital with one less suitcase full of money than SBC. So now we all suffer.


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

reply to SanJoseNerd
said by SanJoseNerd See Profile :

Where I live, the city government taxes telephone service, but it doesn't regulate SBC nor does SBC have a franchise agreement. You don't need a franchise agreement to levy a tax on SBC.
SBC should have a phone franchise agreement. They are normally 30 year terms and automatically renewed with no option to deny though. The FCC retains all regulatory authority so the city cannot regulate SBC through the franchise.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
Member: American Association of Geographers, American Geophysical Union, American Water Resources Association
Forums » Texas Eliminates Local Franchise AgreementsGood bye to... »
« Politicians are so sold to special interests  


Monday, 09-Nov 06:30:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [109] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· Lots of problems lately? [Rogers]
· [Connectivity] What wireless router to use with Extreme 50? Help [Comcast HSI]