hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH | reply to KNO
Re: The solution is simple...
TWC has 911 service on their phones. they're a CLEC. |
|
Goober
Premium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL | reply to calvoiper
No matter what I say, it really wouldn't matter to people like you. |
|
calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
| reply to Goober
If you're saying the attorney does a little bit more, I did forget to add the phrase "hires a whore of an 'expert' who renders an opinion totally divorced from scientific fact" from the list of attorney activities.
If you're saying that American rule on attorney's fees isn't the problem, I'd like to hear more.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
Zyrxil
join:2002-07-22
Rego Park, NY | reply to dartarian
It's Bush's/the Republican's FCC. They call themselves conservatives, but they act like Fascists. That was the point made. |
|
dartarian
join:2004-12-04
Columbus, GA | reply to Cliff
What does Bush or republicans have anything to do with it? |
|
Goober
Premium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
 ·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
| reply to calvoiper
said by calvoiper  :Here, the attorney cranks up the word processor, pays a negligible filing fee, demands millions, takes a third of whatever he gets, and has virtually no risk that he'll have to chip in to pay the defendant's costs if the case is worthless. THAT is the problem. calvoiper It's not quite that simple. But hey, I'd hate to rain on everybody's attorney bashing parade. |
|
KNO
@rr.com | reply to oliphant
I have Oceanic Time Warner and I never got an email, what the hell is Time Warner thinking? |
|
Cliff
join:2002-02-27
Gaithersburg, MD
| reply to cbrain
said by cbrain :So in their effort to protect me from my own failing, big brother will completely disconnect me and keep me from direct dialing help to keep me from perhaps dialing 911 and not getting what I’ve been warned I wouldn’t get. Their warning is sent in writing to inform the people that failed to read the original warning when they signed up. And my taxes just went up. Isn’t it great that the Bush administration treats us like children unable to make our own decisions. Is this about technology or powerful ILECs able to make generous contributions? Is Bush a Republican or Fascist? |
|
doofus_king
join:2004-09-15
Madison, WI | reply to oliphant
typicall fcc. force my voip provider to turn off my phone so i can't call anyone when my house is burning down.
does the cell phone industry have the same rule?
WTF? (or WTF should i expect from the fcc?!!! grrr!) |
|
mjcrocket
Mjc
join:2000-12-02
Abingdon, MD
| reply to rradina
said by rradina :I don't know the facts but if, as it sounds, Vonage proved the call went through (twice), sue the lawyer. Leave the woman alone. The lawyer is the enabler. Vonage sent the call to an unattended answering machine in the building where the 911 center happened to be located. The office where the answering machine was located had nothing to do with the operation of the 911 center! Translation; the lady did register or set up the Vonage 911 service. Vonage sent the call to the wrong number. |
|
calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
| reply to LinuxJunkie
No, attorneys are required by ethical standards to refuse to pursue cases which totally lack merit.
Attorneys should perform a basic evaluation of the facts prior to filing suit. In situations where there isn't time prior to filing (e.g., the statute of limitations is about to run out) then they are under a duty to evaluate their case as soon as possible.
So, attorneys who don't turn down bad cases are risking ethics violations.
The real problem here is that America does not follow the rule on attorney's fees that the rest of the world does. Elsewhere, the LOSER PAYS both sides' reasonable attorneys' fees. That deters most worthless cases from being filed.
Here, the attorney cranks up the word processor, pays a negligible filing fee, demands millions, takes a third of whatever he gets, and has virtually no risk that he'll have to chip in to pay the defendant's costs if the case is worthless. THAT is the problem.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
LinuxJunkie
join:2005-01-19
Cyberspace
| reply to rradina
Actually, that's wrong. An attorney is supposed to do whatever the will of their client(s) is/are -- not what they personally believe. The only truth is the fact that he could have refused to represent her -- but then again, how many attorneys do you know that are going to turn down money. |
|
UHF
All static, all day, Forever
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-24
clubs:
 ·Qwest.net
 ·Callcentric
 ·surpasshosting
 ·Dish Network
·Future Nine Corpor..
| reply to rradina
said by rradina :I don't know the facts but if, as it sounds, Vonage proved the call went through (twice), sue the lawyer. Leave the woman alone. The lawyer is the enabler. Yes, if true it sounds like it may be an instance of malicious litigation, a very serious charge. |
|
Minister
join:2002-01-02
Fleeting | reply to cbrain
Funny, but that's about the size of it.  |
|
cbrain
join:2000-05-21
Silver Spring, MD
·VoicePulse for Bus..
 ·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VoiceStick
·Packet8
| reply to oliphant
So in their effort to protect me from my own failing, big brother will completely disconnect me and keep me from direct dialing help to keep me from perhaps dialing 911 and not getting what I’ve been warned I wouldn’t get. Their warning is sent in writing to inform the people that failed to read the original warning when they signed up. And my taxes just went up. |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO | reply to P Ness
I don't know the facts but if, as it sounds, Vonage proved the call went through (twice), sue the lawyer. Leave the woman alone. The lawyer is the enabler. |
|
P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium
join:2001-08-29
Mineola, NY
clubs: 
| reply to oliphant
said by oliphant :To call the service 9-1-1 it should have to meet certain federal standards. When VOIP operators stop calling it 9-1-1 there won't be any confusion from the idiots who ignored the 50 zillion disclaimers VOIP operators have when you sign up. Even if you did this the laywers would say...well you have the number "9" "1" "1" on the dial program you have...so we are going to blame you!
Sue Sue Sue!!
they should counter sue this woman into the ground as an example for the financial harm she caused the company. Sue the laywer as well for defimation. sure she went through hell and lost her kid...but this would cause people to stop and think before they act.
--
www.stopfcc.comI do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob. |
|
oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA | To call the service 9-1-1 it should have to meet certain federal standards. When VOIP operators stop calling it 9-1-1 there won't be any confusion from the idiots who ignored the 50 zillion disclaimers VOIP operators have when you sign up. |
|
