Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » Using balloons for wireless internet?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Site survey tools? »
« POLL.... top 5's  
AuthorAll Replies

Yahkin

join:2003-11-28
Fort Atkinson, WI

reply to haggleza
Re: Using balloons for wireless internet?

said by haggleza See Profile :

I'm not sure if there are any legal obstacles, but has anybody tried using hydrogen as the lifting gas instead of helium. Some weather balloons use hydrogen. Hydrogen has a higher lifting factor and costs less than half of what helium costs. As these balloons don’t carry people the safety aspect is not so critical.
Somebody still has to fill the balloon, and that is time when you are most likely to have a problem with oxygen mixing with it...As NASA puts it...an uncontrolled fragmentation could occur. Not to mention that hydrogen is a smaller molecule than helium, so it escapes even faster.

Not sure if you want to pay for all those windows that break the first time your floating hydrogen bomb explodes in a storm. :P

Hydrogen is cheaper, prosthetics are not.

haggleza

join:2005-08-22
ZA

reply to jober
I'm not sure if there are any legal obstacles, but has anybody tried using hydrogen as the lifting gas instead of helium. Some weather balloons use hydrogen. Hydrogen has a higher lifting factor and costs less than half of what helium costs. As these balloons don’t carry people the safety aspect is not so critical.

jober

join:2001-12-13

reply to FightingBlue
I did testing with a 8'x16' tethered blimp. I put an AP on the bottom with a 9db omni.
With the 150' rope it worked great. I used an old but new at the time 2meg zcomax450 AP in repeater mode. Also had a cat5 cable wire tied to the rope for power and ethernet.
I got 15 mile to a tower that had a 24db grid with a 1 watt amp.
A blimp is better then a ball because a ball will move all over the place, but the blimp would hold it's position a lot better.
I had high hopes of putting up a bigger one, at about 2500' but there was to much red tape with the FAA and not to mention the people laughing and calling me crazy. This was in the mid 90's when people also said I was a dumb ass for running power over my ethernet cable.
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service ProvidersSite survey tools? »
« POLL.... top 5's  


Friday, 27-Nov 05:27:14 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [115] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [63] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [56] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [Unlock] TUTORIAL: VONAGE WRTP54G/RTP300 WITH 5.01.04 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]