rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
| reply to rradina
Re: Bells
Does this mean that $14.95/month DSL is being funded with POTS revenue?
Something has to be wrong when SBC charged me $50/month (including taxes/fees/regulations) for a POTS line with no features and no long distance. The only plus was it was a metro calling number so that I could dial most STL folks on the MO side of the Mississippi River for free. If I get in my car and drive three miles east, the price drops to ~$40. If I continue driving, folks in the actual city of STL pay even less. I call this rotten. Dirty, stinking and rotten.
I don't deny anyone a fair wage, with benefits. I don't think $50G/year will break any company that's efficient, well managed and that builds an employee base that feels they have a stake in the success of the company. |
|
realist
@ca.frontier
| reply to rradina
I've noticed this site has so many liberals. My point was:
The very same liberals who want dirt cheap broadband and dialtone are also the very same ones who complain about wages and benefits. There is a direct correlation between product pricing and employee wages and benefits.
BTW: According to some of the Bell workers I've talked to (specifically SBC) they claim management has them running with the bare minimum headcount nowadays. |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
| reply to realist
*Sniff* *Sniff* I thought I smelled a socialist.
Until the socialist take total control of this country, that's an awful niave view. What stopped Wal*Mart? What will stop VOIP?
I don't think the average salary of the Bell worker is the problem. The problem stems from the fact that there's TOO MANY of these folks for the true work load. I'm not suggesting 60 hour work weeks. I'm suggesting the average employee probably doesn't work efficiently because of poor leadership. |
|
