TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to TKJunkMail
Re: ARRL will fight BPL to the death
said by TKJunkMail  :Let's face it, the ARRL will fight BPL to the death. Even in those cases where no interference is seen. Their position is that maintenance issues down the road COULD result in interference. »www.astrosurf.org/lombry/qsl-rfi-bpl.htm
Switching transients on power grids with generators going on and off line, dynamic load sharing, fault and maintenance work, all induces massive transients that also swamp data signals.
--
My Web Page
Join Red Room Forum |
|
The Folsom
Kindly Shut Your Noise Hole.
Premium
join:2003-01-31
Yucaipa, CA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| said by TKJunkMail :said by TKJunkMail :Let's face it, the ARRL will fight BPL to the death. Even in those cases where no interference is seen. Their position is that maintenance issues down the road COULD result in interference. » www.astrosurf.org/lombry/qsl-rfi-bpl.htmSwitching transients on power grids with generators going on and off line, dynamic load sharing, fault and maintenance work, all induces massive transients that also swamp data signals. "Broadband Power Line telecommunications & the amateur service Do ban BPL !"
is the title of the article to which you referenced.
How does that bolster your allusion that ARRL/ham radio is somehow incorrect in their/our assertion/postion that BPL is harmful to ALL radio services in that part of the RF spectrum?
The ARRL was only mentioned peripherally, at best, and there was only one link... The ARRL did not even write this article!
There is interference in ALL BPL trials. And it is ALL harmful... no matter what anyone says to the contrary. I can prove that only by supplying links to articles which I have read. You have yet to prove your assertion. 
--
Q: What is- More powerful than God; More evil than Satan; rich people want it and poor people have it; If you eat it you will die? A: Nothing.»www.folsomtech.com |
|
