PhoenixDown
-- Wants FIOS
Premium
join:2003-06-08
Fresh Meadows, NY
clubs:   | reply to PhoenixDown
Re: UNE-P ?
Covad I assume would have unbundled loop agreements already in place for thier SDSL products though its more expensive and less profitable for shared line ADSL.
--
www.pulsetoday.com -- marketing forums! |
|
JohnDrenZ
Premium
join:2000-04-03
Phoenix, AZ
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to PhoenixDown
There wont be any significant impact but a DLEC like covad would have to negotiate an UNE-P loop now instead of line sharing. Line sharing in my opinion really doesnt work for a DLEC because there is no real preprovisioning like what is done for an unbundled loop. So in some cases you get no service or crappy service on a line shared loop. |
|
PhoenixDown
-- Wants FIOS
Premium
join:2003-06-08
Fresh Meadows, NY
clubs:
| If this is the death of line sharing, then I guess the clecs will have to go back to providing DSL over UNE-P?
I can imagine this having a significant impact but will it stop the clecs like Covad who were planning to roll out those new dslams for viop?
--
www.pulsetoday.com -- marketing forums! |
|
