republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Google Invests in Broadband Over Power Lines » Anything definitive on Interference at Cincinnati?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
129
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
2 Questions »
« What a waste of money  
AuthorAll Replies

N3EVL

join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA

Anything definitive on Interference at Cincinnati?

I had heard positive things regarding the apparent lack of interference to HF at the Cincinnati test site but seem to remember reading a posting recently from someone in the affected area stating that the interference was present and significant. Does anyone have definitive info regarding interference at this location?

Maybe it was this hardware/location that was limiting itself to low VHF and/or notching the amateur bands. I don't have much use for the notching approach since it just pushes the problem into someone else's domain (assuming it even works). I also doubt that all users of this hardware will forever limit themselves to a relatively narrow chunk of spectrum - they'll eventually want/need the HF part for additional bandwidth - then watch the complaints surface!

I always though Google was a technically savvy organization but this decision makes me wonder - I hope they know what they're getting into with this technology.


bpl4all

none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!

Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!!


rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA

said by bpl4all:

none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!

Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!!
There is no BPL in Philadelphia; they're rolling out wireless. If you're talking about Manassas, VA, there were at least six FCC filings regarding interference from that site.

N3EVL

join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA

reply to bpl4all
said by bpl4all:

none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!

Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!!
As rf-engineer pointed out your response is lacking in both accuracy and precision. Based on the quality of your input to this debate and Google's surprising selection of this technology, perhaps we can assume that they came to you for investment advice?

Forums » Google Invests in Broadband Over Power Lines2 Questions »
« What a waste of money  


Sunday, 22-Nov 13:01:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [179] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [97] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [92] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [85] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [75] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [67] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· transfer switch location/space limitation [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Why do cats... [General Questions]
· Cleaning rain gutters [Home Repair & Improvement]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Samsung LCD TV No Picture but has Sound [Electronics]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]