vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
 ·Comcast
| Where do you draw the line?
Where do you draw the line as to what's considered TV? What if I watch live streaming video with RealPlayer? Is that TV?
I think what we're going to find is with high-speed networks becoming a reality, a lot of these local regulations like franchise agreements are going to be very cumbersome to enforce. I'd love to hate ILEC's on this because they ARE just motivated the profits, but the reality is local laws are poorly suited to regulating a national industry. |
|
DaveNJ
No Fear
join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
·Patriot Media
 ·Cingular Wireless
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| said by vpoko  :Where do you draw the line as to what's considered TV? What if I watch live streaming video with RealPlayer? Is that TV? I think what we're going to find is with high-speed networks becoming a reality, a lot of these local regulations like franchise agreements are going to be very cumbersome to enforce. I'd love to hate ILEC's on this because they ARE just motivated the profits, but the reality is local laws are poorly suited to regulating a national industry. Comcast customer might disagree with that statement, i kinda think its funny and wrong, that these large corps are balantly breaking a law, and dont care. When the courts catch up, most people dont give huge corps slack.
--
Liberalism weakening The USA everyday... |
|
vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA | reply to vpoko
Would you then care to answer my first question? |
|
silica
join:2004-05-20
Duluth, GA
| The answer is that most unbiased people would draw the line at is IP is an unregulated data service, while rf broadcast, including over fiber, is "regular TV" where local communities have some argument that they should get a franchise fee. Therefore, SBC which seeks to offer only IPTV probably does not need to get franchise approvals while Verizon plans to offer rf videofirst on FIOS, since IPTV isn't technically ready yet.
On an more editorial note: If people want fiber deployment quicker (more speed) and a competitive triple play environment (lower prices), it makes little sense to argue for socking the Bell companies with a franchise fee. Plus the cable companies can offer phone services on IP without any regulation. |
|
calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Actually, as the FCC has just demonstrated, IP phone services will be subject to some regulation, if only on 9-1-1 issues.
Local franchises are a joke--initially they were the way that the cable companies got access to public rights of way, and then became the entirely toothless general regulation of cable TV we have today. They are a tax, and nothing worthwhile more.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
