Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon, SBC IPTV Setback » Statewide Franchises
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
One of the major issues »
« Repeat after me  
AuthorAll Replies


imrf
Premium
join:2002-06-06
Utica, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..

reply to GhostDoggy
Re: Statewide Franchises

said by GhostDoggy See Profile:

I agree, its is all about paperwork. But that is only the initial process. What happens when those small townships start asking for unconventional conditions--which has been illustrated before on DSLR before as example is extreme requests.
That's part of the game in getting cable tv franchises. If Verizon and SBC can't play the game properly, then don't play at all.

A simplification of the process would benefit everyone, not just phone companies diversifying.
Sure, but then the state would also have to give the cable companies the same opportunity.

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA

reply to imrf
I agree, its is all about paperwork. But that is only the initial process. What happens when those small townships start asking for unconventional conditions--which has been illustrated before on DSLR before as example is extreme requests.

A simplification of the process would benefit everyone, not just phone companies diversifying.


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX
reply to GhostDoggy
Regulations that the Bells have to adhere to are the ones they AGREED to have. Not only agreed, but even pushed for it (albeit for ulterior motives). At least the ones they complain so much about.


imrf
Premium
join:2002-06-06
Utica, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..

reply to GhostDoggy
That's the governments fault, they labeled cable as an information service, not a telecommunications service.

I am glad that they so far haven't been give state-wide franchise agreement. It won't be any slower getting local agreements vs. a state-wide one, since they only has service active in a handful of cities. They just need to get off their butts and send out their proposals.

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA
reply to DaveNJ
Yeah, and when cable entered the telephony market without restraints that were placed on the phone companies you had no problems with that unfair advantage.
Forums » Verizon, SBC IPTV SetbackOne of the major issues »
« Repeat after me  


Thursday, 26-Nov 23:39:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [62] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [54] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]