Nerdtalker
Working Hard, Or Hardly Working?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ
clubs: | reply to ArchAngel21x
Re: I was wondering when they were going to jump i
It probably still will, although not as good as their super-duper anti-spyware program.  |
|
ArchAngel21x
MacFan Pro
Premium
join:2001-10-28
Lincoln, NE | reply to Nerdtalker
Does this mean than NAV will no longer eliminate spyware? |
|
Nerdtalker
Working Hard, Or Hardly Working?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ
clubs:
| reply to elboricua
Even the consumer versions of Norton AVs have had "anti-spyware" functionality since NAV 2004.
I don't blame them for wanting to capitalize on the growing antispyware market. |
|
a
@qwest.net | reply to elboricua
Re: I was wondering when they were going to jump in
symantec needs to stick with virus protection & let microsoft handle the spyware removal. |
|
Minvaren
Premium
join:2001-07-26
Houston, TX
clubs:
| reply to elboricua
Re: I was wondering when they were going to jump i
I agree, it can be an alert to if a certain machine on the network may need some "TLC" in a corporate environment.
So far, though, it's been seemingly-random as to which files get marked for deletion, and which are skipped. Either way, it helps out some. |
|
elboricua
El Subestimado
Premium
join:2001-08-12
Bronx, NY
| I was wondering when they were going to jump in
Symantec AV 9.0 Corporate has antispyware capabilities. Not very good but they are there. Just like this beta version it fails to capture all spyware. also at least with the SAV 9.0 it will remove the files in questions but not the associated registry/startup entries. I was wondering when Symantec was going to give their own separate client a whirl.
--
Sending script kiddies to /dev/null since 1995! |
|
