republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon: Rules Schmules » Tough one
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Franchise = graft »
« Verizon is right in this case  
AuthorAll Replies


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

reply to cdru
Re: Tough one

Those so called "public access channels" are just so much fluff to buy support for the cable company. Every little whiny interest group gets to produce its own cable show, and often the local cable company runs some "local newsmakers" show which just produces puff pieces about local politicos. It's just free publicity and fawning media about those politicians and interest groups with the pull to get on the show.

Here in Marin County, they pre-empt the last 5 minutes of each half hour of Headline News with a local blurb about this or that local politico. The @$$-kissing is so extreme that you can hardly hear the conversation for the smooching.

Local franchises don't benefit consumers--they keep out competition and increase the costs of distributing video services. They do help the local power structure, and since the cable companies get to pass along the costs and have fewer competitors, they play along.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
Again though, you're blaming the politicians for the failure of the agreements....

When Comcast had to go around forging new franchise agreements with each AT&T Broadband market, many towns used the leverage to get areas upgraded, schools and municipal buildings wired, etc......

Some just used it for a money-grab.


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

To get areas upgraded, competition without the inhibitions of local franchises would be a better incentive. The only reason Comcast/ATT had to be leveraged into upgrades is that they felt relatively "safe" from competition because of their franchise agreements.

As for the wiring of school or muni buildings, the franchise agreement just serves as a back-door tax increase. These are worthy expenses, but they should be paid for through traditional means, not hidden costs buried in cable rates.

I remain convinced that franchise agreements serve only local political greed and to limit competition.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Verizon: Rules SchmulesFranchise = graft »
« Verizon is right in this case  


Sunday, 08-Nov 13:56:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· Odd Memory Issue [Computer Hardware Help]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Game console [General Questions]
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· no Globalive/Wind Mobile in Canada [TekSavvy]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]