cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA
| reply to pkats
Re: IP layout
A full class C is the norm with most real T-1 providers.
Firstly I have 2 questions and that is why the second octet keeps changing, that would imply a much larger network.
Also a .224 netmask only yeilds 29 usable IP addresses (1 for the network id, 1 for the gateway and 1 for the broadcast ip, which is also why .255 doesn't work)
Secondly the subnet math is off, I'd download a subnet calculator like the free one at solarwinds website. |
|
pkats
join:2003-02-13
| reply to pkats
Oops let me try that again |
|
VariableARK
join:2003-03-17
USA | reply to pkats
full class c ? howd u manage that? that is awesome! |
|
pkats
join:2003-02-13
| reply to pkats
Does this make more sense or am I way off? |
|
pkats
join:2003-02-13
| reply to pkats
I may have over simplified the diagram. I plan on routing at the main router and at each access point. The growth thing is hard to guess. I would like to put about 40 to 50 customers on each access point before I switch to sectors and three access points on each tower but the subnets don't split nice for that. I will update my drawing and repost it. |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
 ·Charter Pipeline
1 edit | reply to pkats
Check your subnet math and don't expect to have "255" usable addresses.
How many clients are you serving currently? In the next 6 months?
Also, how do you plan on assigning IP addys? Bridged or routed?
--
] :: my trivial ramblings :: [ |
|
pkats
join:2003-02-13
| I need some help. I’m switching my network from DSL line using mainly private IPs to a T1 and getting a full class C of public IPs. I know enough about routing to be dangerous. I need a second opinion on my proposed network layout to see if it will work. |
|
