republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Packet8 Joins 'Unfee' Trend » what is that for again
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Makes VoIP even more Useless  
AuthorAll Replies


nemo2

@adelphia.net

reply to Pony99CA
Re: what is that for again

They are a VOIP provider there are NO government fees they have to pay so this entire discussion is mute. The fee is not to cover any fee it is to cover supposed inquiries being made about the possibility of charging fees. Essentially it's a load of bull.

Pony99CA

join:2004-09-05
Hollister, CA

reply to Maxo
said by Maxo See Profile:

I don't expect the company to just eat the fee. But it should be included in the monthly cost. The thing is that companies advertise something like, "Phone line for just $29.99/month" but it's actually $29.99/month + taxes + USC + fee x + fee z = $39.99/month.
So you really don't want it included in the monthly cost, but in the advertised price. I agree that companies should do that, but it's not that easy. For example, if a company charges a fee that's based on usage, you can't really calculate that ahead of time. Also, for national advertising, those fees may vary from state to state, so the company would have to create 50 ads. That's why most of these companies have fine print in their ads (or really fast disclaimers on radio or TV ads).

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see better full disclosure of fees. I hate calling a hotel and asking what their nightly rate is, being told $100 per night, and then finding out on checkout that I owe $112.50 because of the 11% transient tax and the $1.50 phone charge (even if I didn't use their phones). They should be required to disclose those charges as part of the price, but I do like seeing them spelled out on my bill instead of just being included in the cost.


Maxo
Your tax dollars at work.
Premium,VIP
join:2002-11-04
Tallahassee, FL
clubs:

reply to Pony99CA
I don't expect the company to just eat the fee. But it should be included in the monthly cost. The thing is that companies advertise something like, "Phone line for just $29.99/month" but it's actually $29.99/month + taxes + USC + fee x + fee z = $39.99/month.
If I delivered apples from point a to point b I wouldn't advertise, "Apple delivery $5 per round trip." then send out a bill that says:
Round trip X 2 $10
Taxes X $1.19
Gas $2
Truck wear and tear $1
Total: $18.19

Instead I would advertise, "Apple delivery $8 per round trip." This way the consumer knows what they are paying for before they choose. By putting those recovered cost else where they are being less than honest in their advertising.
--
"Boys are girls" - Laura Bush
»www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad
Forums » Packet8 Joins 'Unfee' Trend« Makes VoIP even more Useless  


Saturday, 28-Nov 01:00:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [64] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [45] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· TPIA review by Electronic Box [Canadian Broadband]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Scam] Cruise line mail? [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]