CableSchmable
@208.17.x.x | What more info?
"As does company's refusal to provide info"
Why? What is it some people want to hear? Obviously it is some type of equiptment failure or DDoS attack. Why do some people need the EXACT reason? So you can b*tch with detail? |
|
besonen
join:2005-04-14
| i'll bite.
transparency is a _requirement_. it builds trust.
if i want to create anything that relies on external relationships (with Comcast, my significant other, my friend, any entity) i need to establish trust.
transparency not only builds trust, it also maintains it. additionally, transparency is a simple mechanism to insure that you are fullfilling your commitments (assuming fullfilling your commitments is your intention).
here's a book with a related title that i plan on reading:
The Naked Corporation : How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business
»www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de···43246500
ciao,
david |
|
major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:
| said by besonen  :i'll bite. transparency is a _requirement_. it builds trust. if i want to create anything that relies on external relationships (with Comcast, my significant other, my friend, any entity) i need to establish trust. transparency not only builds trust, it also maintains it. additionally, transparency is a simple mechanism to insure that you are fullfilling your commitments (assuming fullfilling your commitments is your intention). here's a book with a related title that i plan on reading: The Naked Corporation : How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business » www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de···43246500ciao, david Sorry but you are living in a dream world if you believe that book will compel any major corporate entity into being "transparent" with its consumer base. It's all empty words and pie in the sky promises. No white collar corporate CEO criminal would ever think of implementing transparency b/c it would depreciate his ability to screw over the s/h and the employees who are in many cases one and the same entities. In case you live in a fantasyland where business does the "right" thing by its customers/employees see also Enron et al. Last time I checked Ken Lay was still free to enjoy the millions he fleeced from employees retirement funds.
--
MFSO.org -ArnoldWatch.org - opensecrets.org -DigitalConsumer.org - FTCR.org - Privacy.org - Adbusters.org - Eff.com - Democraticmedia.org - HealthPrivacy.org - Hacktivismo.com - ClearChannelSucks.org - Epic.org |
|
besonen
join:2005-04-14
| > Sorry but you are living in a dream world if you
> believe that book will compel any major corporate
> entity into being "transparent" with its consumer base.
thanks for letting me know what you read. what i'd like you to read is that it's not my intention to change any entity. however, what i have done done and what i will continue to do is to choose relationships with entities that are transparent. if this leads to the demise of non-transparent entities that will simply be a side effect. |
|
major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:
| said by besonen :> i will continue to do is to choose relationships with entities that are transparent. Yeah, good luck with that. |
|
