reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL
| reply to Othello235
Re: Bureaucratic nightmare for an ISP
But what if a page was not properly marked as dynamic? I'd be POed if I couldn't see new posts on one of my favorite forums. If I wanted caching, I'd just run squid on my server.
Also, how would a web cache detect http traffic? Would it just pass all port 80 traffic. What about sites on port 83? What about sites on port 1351 or 8684? |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
 ·Cox HSI
 ·Speakeasy
| reply to reub2000
said by reub2000  :What about dynamic content. How would it detect that? Ask th folks at Oracle. They seem to think that their cache-engine properly handles dynamic content.
-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased) |
|
Othello235
@silvereaglemfg.com | reply to reub2000
As long as the page is written correctly, the author will have included a tag noting the dynamic content, which will then not be cached |
|
reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL | reply to nixen
What about dynamic content. How would it detect that? |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to reub2000
said by reub2000 :Which would have a bit of overhead. I hope it doesn't add too much though. Use of proxies can improve web content viewing. That's the whole premise behind a content-accelerator: you proxy a group of users behind a caching device. The first person to visit a site experiences a small access-time penalty (generally not something noticeable). All subsequent visitors for the target site fetch content from the local cache, not the remote site. Therefore, their fetches are done from closer hosts, thereby accelerating downloads (since the fetches are only going one or two hops, not tens of hops).
-tom
--
"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased) |
|
reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL | reply to xirian
Which would have a bit of overhead. I hope it doesn't add too much though. |
|
xirian
Premium
join:2003-01-26
Beacon, NY | reply to TKJunkMail
Since its just blocking a list of porn sites, Id think they'd just send all the http traffic through a transparent proxy. |
|
